No. of Recommendations: 3
But that was the point: put her same positions in a non-telegenic package. Would our theoretical lumpy, balding dude be in the same position?
It's always an advantage in politics to be telegenic, and an older balding dude can also be telegenic (hi, Dwayne Johnson!).
And that's why I gave you the example of John Fetterman - who occupied a similar "darling of the progressives and terminally online" lane in 2022, despite being middle aged and bald during his candidacy.
So, yeah. She's successful because she's very charismatic, incredibly adept at using modern communication tools like social media, has an issue set and a biography (again, "bartender to contender") that was perfectly aligned with what the base of the party wanted in a candidate at that time. And her rise to prominence within the party has been the result of forging connections, alliances, and relationships within the House and among party folks around the country. A bald male with the same set of skills, issues, positions, and background would have done just fine and would have been plenty successful.
