Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 2
Eom
No. of Recommendations: 1
Beat me by 2 minutes!
No. of Recommendations: 5
[Thurston Howell III voice] How pleasant. Will they be serving a crudités platter and charcuterie board at the formal reception announcing his nomination? Anything less would be absolutely ghastly, right lovie?
No. of Recommendations: 4
Hey, it could have been worse!
I was anticipating Homer Simpson.
You can’t fix stupid.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Positively ghastly, har har!
No. of Recommendations: 3
I was anticipating Homer Simpson.
D'oh!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Homer, Marge and Bart went Trump.
Even the convenience store owner told you people to pound sand and wet trump.
You got Lisa though but even she is getting rid of pronouns.
Everyone doesn't worship the AssAndPee500.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Oz dispensed nutritional and lifestyle advice on his show, portraying himself as a trusted doctor capable of explaining health matters in an engaging and approachable way. But his show also blurred the line between medical advice and advertising, failing to make clear to his audience just how closely he worked with the companies he pitched.
He repeatedly promoted products of questionable medical value and was named in lawsuits that alleged he made misleading claims on the show. Several of the companies he has promoted are structured as multilevel marketing businesses whose practices have repeatedly drawn the attention of federal regulators.https://www.yahoo.com/news/know-dr-mehmet-oz-trump...Seven troubling reasons (among others) why Oz is unqualified:
https://www.self.com/story/dr-oz-misleading-health...And now, his work has come under even greater scrutiny in the British Medical Journal, which on Wednesday published a study analyzing Oz’s claims along with those made on another medical talk show. What they found wasn’t reassuring. The researchers, led by Christina Korownyk of the University of Alberta, charged medical research either didn’t substantiate — or flat out contradicted — more than half of Oz’s recommendations.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp...
No. of Recommendations: 4
And now, his work has come under even greater scrutiny in the British Medical Journal, which on Wednesday published a study analyzing Oz’s claims along with those made on another medical talk show. What they found wasn’t reassuring. The researchers, led by Christina Korownyk of the University of Alberta, charged medical research either didn’t substantiate — or flat out contradicted — more than half of Oz’s recommendations.
A grifter like Trump. Perfect.
