Post New

… so bright we will need shades once the full picture emerges when dedicated administration officials have successfully concluded on those treacherous ‚highly technical, in-person talks‘:


US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn’t account for back-channel commitments

…

The officials described the text of the agreement as incredibly vague, mainly intended to create a more favorable environment for the highly technical, in-person talks to come. They added that the framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience. …

So much to those malicious speculations that the framework were aimed at providing the US administration the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience…

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/16/politics/iran-a...

US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn’t account for back-channel commitments

Hoo boy. No surprise they're downplaying the text of the agreement, because it is awful. Iran didn't just get immediate waivers both from all oil sanctions and from any banking, insurance, and other financial restrictions. They got a release of frozen assets:

11 — The United States undertakes that, in light of the progress of negotiations towards a final agreement, frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be released and made fully available. These funds, whether held in the master account or transferred, will be used for any final beneficiary payment determined by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran and will be fully available for use. The United States undertakes to issue all necessary permits and licenses on this basis.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-...

I mean - wow. That language is just....wow. A plain reading of the text is that all frozen funds and assets are getting released. And the U.S. will do everything necessary to have that happen. Talk about pallets of cash! And it's not contingent on there ever being a final deal; this language reads that it's being given to them now, in light of "progress" of negotiations. Not contingent on those negotiations resulting in the final agreement, not to be provided after a final agreement is in place. Now.

Note also that the "final agreement" scope is defined to be "the fate of enriched material and the fate of all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues, including Iran’s nuclear needs, will be adequately addressed in a final agreement; the final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article." No mention of ballistic missiles, no mention of support of regional proxies. All the things that the JCPOA was supposedly "ass" for not including, the parties do not at present contemplate will be part of this final agreement.

I mean...wow. All Iran agreed to do is go back to February 26th. In exchange, we give them relief from all oil and gas sanctions, all related sanctions so that the money is clean and usable, and to unfreeze their assets. And we spent many tens of billions of dollars for this. Yeah, no wonder Admin flacks are running away from this and claiming that there's some better "unwritten" deal that's the real deal...

More audience-selling im action already:

Trump: Iran memorandum ‘not final,’ we’ll be ‘back to dropping bombs on their heads’ if talks fail

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/trump...

I mean...wow. All Iran agreed to do is go back to February 26th. In exchange, we give them relief from all oil and gas sanctions, all related sanctions so that the money is clean and usable, and to unfreeze their assets. And we spent many tens of billions of dollars for this.

A brilliant Trump victory.

If you wonder how Dope and the MAGA crowd can view disaster as victory, here's Gemini's summary of FOX 'news' reporting on the Iran 'deal'...

FOX News’ coverage of President Trump’s newly announced peace agreement with Iran reflects a supportive framing that emphasizes strong American leverage, structural compliance, and the potential for regional economic relief.

The network’s reporting focuses on several key narrative threads:

### 1. Framing the Accord as a Victory of "Maximum Pressure"

FOX News presents the emerging agreement as a direct result of Trump’s willingness to exert hard power and military leverage. Coverage highlights that the deal was secured only after a period of intense combat, the enforcement of a strict U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports, and Trump’s explicit public threats to seize vital assets like Kharg Island. Network segments feature administration officials arguing that Iran "took a pounding" and was ultimately forced to the negotiating table from a position of weakness.

### 2. Emphasizing Strict Compliance and "No Freebies"

A central theme across FOX News programming—including interviews on *Special Report* and *The Five*—is that the deal is strictly performance-based. The network heavily features Vice President JD Vance (who led portions of the mediation) pushing back against critics who suggest the administration is being soft on Tehran. FOX coverage emphasizes that:

* Iran must meet rigorous, verifiable milestones before receiving any economic or sanctions relief.
* Any potential release of frozen assets or lifting of the naval blockade is contingent on "serious compliance of very good things for the Americans."
* The U.S. framework aims to ensure Iran can never develop a nuclear weapon, must clear mines, and must fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz without tolls.

### 3. Combatting "Fake" Leaks and Iranian Propaganda

When Iranian state media began broadcasting a vastly different narrative—claiming the deal included no nuclear clauses and would immediately unfreeze $12 billion in assets—FOX News framed these reports as deceptive posturing by a desperate regime. The network gave prominent airtime to Trump’s social media pushback, where he blasted Tehran's negotiators as "very dishonorable" and flatly rejected the leaked terms as having nothing to do with what was agreed to in writing.

### 4. Highlighting Anticipated Domestic Economic Relief

On the economic front, FOX News has framed the resolution of the conflict as a imminent win for American consumers. In appearances on the network (such as *The Ingraham Angle*), Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other economic analysts have focused on how stabilizing the Middle East and restoring shipping lanes will almost immediately lower global oil prices and ease domestic inflation pressures.

I mean...wow.

But Al, this one is so much better because it wasn’t done by a black President.

And we got to flex our manly man strength by dropping a metric sh!t ton of bombs on a bunch of non Christian foreigners. That makes it better, too.

Sarcastically Yours,
—Peter

Post New

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.