No. of Recommendations: 11
bighairymike:
"... the nation would have no recourse to deter a president from inciting his supports during a State of the Union to kill opposing lawmakers ... to ensure he remains in office unlawfully ..."
Jack Smith cautioning voters if Trump wins...More lies. They never end with you folks.
In addressing Donald Trump's broad claims of presidential immunity, Smith argues in his filing that if the high court were to rule the president has total immunity from criminal charges as Trump argues, that could, in effect,
"license presidents to commit crimes to remain in office.” What about a “president who orders the National Guard to murder his most prominent critics; or a president who sells nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary?”
If the president is truly immune when he uses his official power, “the nation would have no recourse to deter a president from inciting his supporters during a state of the union address to kill opposing lawmakers — thereby hamstringing any impeachment proceeding — to ensure that he remains in office unlawfully,” he wrote.In a court filing, Smith is simply arguing against the Nixonian absurdity that "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal," not cautioning voters about what
will happen if Trump is reelected.
Seriously, why are you supporting this POS?
For cryinoutloud, he walked off with 15 boxes of the nation's most closely guarded intelligence information. That alone should disqualify him in your eyes. Why doesn't it? Each of you spent months, years, insisting Clinton belonged in prison for having a fraction of the documents Trump kept in an unlocked bathroom and on a stage in a ballroom accessible to thousands of people.
You have Haley or DeSantis or Christie and their policies are essentially the same, so why cling to him if, as you repeatedly claim, you are not in a cult?
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-01-08/... 