Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro


Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Post New
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: New power: Company over investors
Date: 03/02/26 8:48 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trumps-se...

A new federal approach giving U.S. companies more say over which proposals shareholders can vote on at their annual meetings is creating regulatory uncertainty and leading to litigation, activists said.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in November changed its traditional process of having staff sign off before a company rejected votes on shareholder proposals. Instead it gave executives more discretion to pick which resolutions would appear on their proxy statements, the mandated document issued before shareholder meetings.

The change has prompted at least three investor lawsuits - against AT&T (T.N), opens new tab, Axon Enterprises (AXON.O), opens new tab and PepsiCo (PEP.O), opens new tab - and potentially more to follow. By stepping back, the SEC injected uncertainty into the engagement process, said Giovanna Eichner, shareholder advocate at Green Century Capital Management, a climate-focused Boston asset manager.
"More than anything, this lack of structure and rules is actually just leaving everyone unsure about the best way to move forward," Eichner said.

An SEC spokesman declined to comment. A person familiar with the agency's thinking said in November the change was driven partly to save staff time.

Jeff
Print the post


Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: New power: Company over investors
Date: 03/02/26 10:03 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0

A new federal approach giving U.S. companies more say over which proposals shareholders can vote on at their annual meetings is creating regulatory uncertainty and leading to litigation, activists said.

This move has been in the works for years. It was probably a decade ago, where I saw data showing a significant increase in management requests to suppress shareholder proposals, claiming they were similar to previous proposals, or frivolous.

As noted before, management seems to, increasingly, regard itself as law unto itself, rather than the employees of the shareholders.

Steve
Print the post


Author: jerryab   😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: New power: Company over investors
Date: 03/02/26 10:08 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
the change was driven partly to save staff time.

Eliminate the board. Then they all have LOTS of time--to NOT bother the shareholders.
Print the post


Author: unquarked   😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: New power: Company over investors
Date: 03/03/26 12:56 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
management seems to, increasingly, regard itself as law unto itself, rather than the employees of the shareholders.

Or ... The administration seems to, increasingly, regard itself as law unto itself, rather than representative of the citizenry.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds