Post #3456 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

Your initial claim was that the DOJ could have nailed Clinton for the servers under 18 USC 1924. I'm pointing out to you why that's not true - because that section doesn't criminalize the mere possession or maintenance of classified information in an unauthorized place. - albaby

Perhaps the people who make the laws leave these tunnels they may need to crawl though some day.

Pass a get tough on corruption law with all the fanfare and publicity and voter admiration that goes with it without ever mentioning the technicalities that make it toothless when applied to a well connected politician. Is there any wonder common folks with common sense see this a two tiered?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.