Post New

Interesting discussion;

. The IPO Basics (Recap from the Podcast)
SpaceX filed confidentially on ~April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion (or higher) valuation.
Planned raise: Up to $75 billion — potentially the largest IPO ever.
Expected listing: June 2026.
Starlink dominates revenue (~$20B annually), with strong projected profits.
The hosts (especially Chamath) see the IPO as providing a daily "market-validated" valuation, reducing internal shareholder drama, and paving the way for a likely Tesla-SpaceX merger.
The IPO itself sets a headline valuation, but the real leverage comes from what happens after listing — through index inclusion.
2. How Indexing Creates Massive Structural Demand
Index funds and ETFs (which hold trillions in assets) don't pick stocks — they must buy shares to match their benchmark index (e.g., S&P 500, Nasdaq-100/QQQ).
Fast-track inclusion rules are being changed specifically for mega-IPOs like SpaceX:
Nasdaq has updated rules for "fast entry" into the Nasdaq-100 (as soon as ~10–15 trading days after listing for top-ranked new companies).
S&P Dow Jones Indices and others are discussing accelerated inclusion for giant, profitable IPOs (bypassing or shortening the usual 12-month trading history or high public float requirements).
SpaceX is reportedly lobbying index providers for rapid inclusion.
Low float + multiplier effect:
SpaceX plans a small initial public float (estimated 3–8%, with Elon retaining tight control via dual-class shares).
For low-float stocks, Nasdaq applies a 5x multiplier on the tradable shares when calculating index weight. A $75B float could be treated as ~$375B for weighting purposes.
Result: Even with a tiny actual float, SpaceX could get a meaningful weight (e.g., ~1.6% in Nasdaq-100).
Forced buying power:
Nasdaq-100 funds (like QQQ, ~$570B AUM) would need to buy billions in SpaceX shares during rebalancing.
S&P 500 inclusion (with $15–20T+ benchmarked) could trigger $300–400 billion in demand from passive funds alone if weighted similarly to large tech names.
This creates automatic, price-insensitive buying — index funds buy regardless of the share price, providing a tailwind that supports or inflates the valuation.
In short: The IPO listing + rapid index inclusion turns passive investors' money into a built-in buyer base, reducing selling pressure and helping sustain the lofty valuation.
3. Valuation Advantages from Indexing
Headline credibility: A high IPO price sets the initial mark. Index inclusion then "locks in" visibility and liquidity, making the $1.75T+ valuation feel more "real" and defensible.
Merger synergy boost (podcast highlight): A validated public valuation for SpaceX makes a Tesla-SpaceX merger easier and more accretive. Combined, they could approach ~$3T, with clearer market pricing.
Ecosystem halo: Inclusion in major indices increases analyst coverage, retail/institutional interest, and perceived stability — all supporting higher multiples.
Broader 2026 IPO wave context: The hosts note many AI/tech companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) may follow. SpaceX going first at a trillion-dollar scale sets a precedent and pressures index rules further, benefiting the whole cohort.

Becky could have asked Buffett if Brk had any interest in participating in any of these IPOs, oh well. Even an odd lot, 1-5 billion.

Becky could have asked Buffett if Brk had any interest in participating in any of these IPOs, oh well. Even an odd lot, 1-5 billion.

She realized everyone already knew the answer. Normal folks don’t need to hear the same answer 4-500 times only to ask the same question.

" Yes, Berkshire Hathaway has bought an IPO. Recently, Berkshire Hathaway committed to invest over half a billion dollars in an upcoming IPO for Snowflake, a tech company. This marks a significant move for Berkshire, as it is the first time they have participated in an IPO, traditionally avoiding such transactions.""



so many experts on one site we truly are blessed. ::))



ucmtsu,no way.

The answer wasn't stupid. The question asking Buffett about the SPACE X was.Everyone knows what Buffett thinks about IPOS .

" Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway made a notable investment in Snowflake during its IPO in 2020, acquiring shares at around $120 each. This was an unusual move for Buffett, as he typically avoids tech companies that lack steady earnings. However, the investment was backed by Buffett's prot้g้, Todd Combs, who had a personal connection to Snowflake and understood its business model. "


I wonder how Greg feels about this topic? Has Buffett discussed this with Greg? Has Greg raised the possibility with Buffett?


nuf said.

That wasn't Buffett, it was either Todd or Ted. Thanks for playing

Interested to hear about thoughts on the changes to the rules to allow fastrack of these companies inclusion in the indexes. Also the valuations being mentioned for this biggest IPO in history are at crazy multiples. Diacussion around retail investora being taken advantage off through indexing.

My view, it all makes sense if your name is Elon Musk.

SpaceX mining and processing on the moon with full robotics followed with electrical slingshot delivery to earth is both wild and logical to this science degree holder. These are interesting times, indeed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV_SwrIvHTQ&t=243s

Uwharrie

The only way that "mining" space resources possibly makes sense is if you're using those resources *in* space, to avoid launch costs. And the only vaguely plausible project anyone's proposed that would make massive use of resources in space is solar power satellites to supply power *to* Earth. SPS was a not completely ludicrous, but extreme long-shot approach to "energy independence" during the 1970s and 1980s, but senseless now that ground-based solar and wind + storage have flat-out won the argument about the future of energy sources.

All this stuff about "robotics" and "processing" in space has the slight problem of space lacking everything industrial projects on Earth assume, like water, air, cooling, and the ability to, relatively cheaply, send some guy out with a honking large wrench to pound some sense into the hardware.

None of this is in any way new. People have been looking at the economics and engineering of "space industrialization" for over half a century, and you can find extreme optimist tales of how great it would be for just about as long (see T. A. Heppenheimer, for example, or the L-5 Society). Sure, if launch costs drop dramatically new markets will open up, but not on a level that would justify a $2T company valuation.

All that said, I would be happy to send Dilbert Stark to Mars. If he does not return.

Post New

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.