Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48491 
Subject: Re: Why Trump keeps yammering about a 3rd term
Date: 04/01/2025 4:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Neither Obama nor Pelosi thought Harris was the best candidate.

Entirely possible. Obama and Pelosi represent different (though overlapping) wings of the Democratic party, and Harris might not have been best for either of their factions. Even assuming there is a single "best" candidate to be the nominee, it's also not unusual for that candidate to not win the primary. Nor am I saying that it's certain that Harris would have won the nomination.

But being the sitting vice president is an enormous advantage in a primary - it's very rare for an incumbent VP to enter the race and lose the nomination. The reworked primary calendar also favored Harris compared to her 2016 run, moving South Carolina ahead of Iowa and moving California out of June and onto the March 5 Super Tuesday.

Who do you think would have beaten her? I can't think of anyone but Newsom that I would think would be a favorite over her - and not by much.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds