Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: rnam   😊 😞
Number: of 203 
Subject: More valuable broken up
Date: 05/13/2025 10:50 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
One of the largest tech companies would be more valuable if it was smaller, according to a Wall Street analyst.

D.A. Davidson’s Gil Luria is calling for a “complete breakup” of Alphabet Inc., saying such a move is the best way to unleash shareholder value.

Luria sees AI competition as a persistent headwind facing the company, limiting the market’s ability to fully value Alphabet’s other notable businesses, including YouTube, Waymo, and its Tensor Processing Units (TPU) chips. Alphabet’s myriad businesses include “the top competitors” to such varied Wall Street favorites as Netflix Inc. and advertising-technology company Trade Desk Inc., he wrote, along with both Amazon.com Inc. and Microsoft Corp. in cloud computing, and both Uber Technologies Inc. and Tesla Inc. in autonomous driving.

Luria argued that “the current pieces would trade at $243/share in aggregate upon breakup, and closer to $300/share if an independent TPU business started selling outside of the Alphabet family.” Those targets represent upside of about 53% and 89%, respectively.

“By keeping the conglomerate structure, management is dooming all of its businesses to the 16x Search multiple,” he wrote. “Until management acts in the interest of shareholders, the entire business will trade at 16x earnings, which assigns zero value to Waymo and TPU, and severely undervalues YouTube, Cloud and Network.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-13...


Print the post


Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 203 
Subject: Re: More valuable broken up
Date: 05/13/2025 11:27 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
The value of the "conglomerate" seems to have escaped the fellow--most (not all) of the moving parts contribute data to the profiling and targeting for the ad business. Maybe that sort of profiling is distasteful in a way, but it certainly is profitable. A breakup would mean that each daughter firm would have to collect data and create profiles separately, which would destroy a huge amount of the current value.

Jim
Print the post


Author: sykesix 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48448 
Subject: Re: More valuable broken up
Date: 05/13/2025 12:55 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
The search business funds speculative or early stage ventures like Waymo, Cloud, and TPU chips. It is like insurance float in a way. It isn't "free" money, but it is pretty close and it can be invested in other parts of the enterprise.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds