Invite ye felawes and frendes desirous in gold to enter the gates of Shrewd'm, for they will thanke ye later.
- Manlobbi
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 7
New term begins today.
Using the shadow docket, they ruled in Trump's favor 21 times and against him just 3 times.
Now those cases will be heard in full. Will anything change?
Will we soon learn how very much this activist court loves their special boy?
Of course, much of the damage has already been done, so in some cases the outcome is mute.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Using the shadow docket, they ruled in Trump's favor 21 times and against him just 3 times.
Now those cases will be heard in full. Will anything change?
Wait, are you saying that those cases already decided have the potential to be re-decided differently?
No. of Recommendations: 2
Now those cases will be heard in full.
I don't think all of them will be heard in full. Is anyone keeping track? Democracy docket?
No. of Recommendations: 2
Yes, theoretically. The emergency docket (also called shadow docket) is not a final ruling. But with this SCOTUS? We'll see.
Wait, are you saying that those cases already decided have the potential to be re-decided differently?
No. of Recommendations: 0
those cases already decided have the potential to be re-decided differently?
That is the point of having the Shadow Docket.
If there is a DIFFERENT PRESIDENT, then the Shadow Dockets decisions "go away" and get redetermined as most favorably to the RWNJs.
The problem is simple. The RWNJ majority has fatally shot itself. As following the law regarding appointments AND dismissals has been overturned, the justices can be removed at whim for violating the Excremental Output declaration.
