Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 4
Tulsi's not messing around.
I always knew - and posted in the past - that the Russian Collusion Hoax generated from the highest levels of the Obama administration.
https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/19462675804755806...Newly declassified records from
@DNIGabbard
are additional, compelling evidence that the 2016 Russia Collusion narrative was not rooted in credible intelligence reporting, but manufactured to fit a preferred political narrative.
Gabbard has taken the rare and transparent step of declassifying a December 2016 draft of the President’s Daily Brief or PDB.
This highly classified record, which is a daily national security analysis for the President, assessed that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against (election) infrastructure.”
But after push back from the FBI, then led by James Comey, the PDB was spiked “based on new guidance.”
After a White House Principals meeting, a new intelligence assessment was commissioned, and media leaks followed, reinforcing a new narrative that “Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system.”Hmm. Only 1 guy could spike the real thing. Wonder who that was?
https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/194627140297131251...<i.Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President
@realDonaldTrump
, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic. Here’s how:
Jail time for the Obama bros.
On Dec 8, 2016, IC officials prepared an assessment for the President's Daily Brief, finding that Russia "did not impact recent U.S. election results" by conducting cyber attacks on infrastructure.
The next day, top national security officials including FBI Dir James Comey, CIA Dir John Brennan and DNI James Clapper gathered at the Obama White House to discuss Russia. Obama directed the IC to create a new intelligence assessment that detailed Russian election meddling, even though it would contradict multiple intelligence assessments released over the previous several months.Because of course he did. He's one of the most corrupt people ever to occupy the office.
Obama officials immediately leaned on their allies in the media to advance their falsehoods. Anonymous IC sources leaked classified information to the Washington Post and others that Russia had intervened to hack the election in Trump's favor.Because of course they did.
On January 6, 2017, just days before President Trump took office, DNI Clapper unveiled the Obama-directed politicized assessment, a gross weaponization of intelligence that laid the groundwork for a years-long coup intended to subvert President Trump’s entire presidency.
According to whistleblower emails shared with us today, we know Clapper and Brennan used the baseless discredited Steele Dossier as a source to push this false narrative in the intelligence assessment.Not another word out of any lib about corruption in politics. Not now, not ever.
These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard
@DNIGabbard
·
1h
This betrayal concerns every American. The integrity of our democratic republic demands that every person involved be investigated and brought to justice to prevent this from ever happening again.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard
@DNIGabbard
·
1h
I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Tulsi isn't messing around:
DNI Tuls Gabbard issued the following statement:
"The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue. It is one that concerns every American. The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people," said DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
She used the T word. No, not 'testosterone', another word that the democrats have little familiarity with, but "treasonous".
No. of Recommendations: 3
And no wonder the left is so wee-wee'd up about the BS Epstein thing:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-admin-manuf...Documents revealed that in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia was "probably not trying…to influence the election by using cyber means."They knew. They knew and they misled the public and de-railed Trump's first term.
Comey and Brennan off to jail, for starters.
One instance was on Dec. 7, 2016, weeks after the election. Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s talking points stated: "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome."
Fox News Digital obtained a declassified copy of the Presidential Daily Brief, which was prepared by the Department of Homeland Security, with reporting from the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, FBI, National Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security, State Department and open sources, for Obama, dated Dec. 8, 2016.
"We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure," the Presidential Daily Brief stated. "Russian Government-affiliated actors most likely compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."BTW you can see a lot of these docs. Unlike the Epstein thing.
Boom.
Happy Friday!
No. of Recommendations: 4
The meeting included top officials in the National Security Council, Clapper, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice, then-Secretary of State John Kerry, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among others, to discuss Russia.
Time for these folks to lawyer up. McCabe is the lowest on the totem pole here; he's not going to have the resources to defend himself when his life is turned inside out by the Feds. Put the screws to him and have him flip on the others.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Here's what I think happened. So the original PDB gets spiked because it concluded The Wrong Thing. Russia evidently DID hack into Illinois' voter database, but it didn't matter: in 2016 Hillary! won the state by 16 points, the same margin that Obama had in 2012. (for the record Biden won it by 17 in 2020).
Let's apply the maximum fairness to Barack Obama:
The declassified meeting record, obtained by Fox News Digital, revealed that principals "agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for cyber operations as a response to cyber activity that attempted to influence or interfere with U.S. elections, if such activity meets the requirements" from an executive order that demanded the blocking of property belonging to people engaged in cyber activities.
After the meeting, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Clapper’s executive assistant emailed intelligence community leaders tasking them to create a new intelligence community assessment "per the president’s request," that detailed the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election."
He probably told his henchmen to Send Russia A Message for hacking into Illinois. But the henchmen (Clapper, Brennan, Comey) took it as an opportunity to de-rail Trump's Presidency, if not eliminate it entirely.
That's the maximally fair explanation. The not-so-fair explanation is different.
No. of Recommendations: 4
And of course, here's some quotes from the PDB itself:
Possible Russian Government–affiliated cyber actors extracted voter data,
mostly containing names and addresses of voters, from Illinois’s Board of
Elections registration database in July that lacked adequate security
safeguards. We also observed scanning and similar efforts against Secretary of
State systems and websites in up to 20 more states from servers operated by
a Russian-owned company with ties to Russian military cyber actors—the
same infrastructure used against
Illinois.
• We have low-to-moderate confidence in the Russian Government’s
involvement because of our uncertainty about its utility for a state actor, a
lack of observed effects from the low-profile operation, and the actors’ use of
obfuscation techniques, which included substantial overlap with criminal
actors using similar targeting patterns and tactics. The activities did coincide
with high-profile Russian cyber-enabled data leaks during the election, which
we assess probably were intended to cause psychological effects, such as
undermining the credibility of the election process and
candidates.
In other words...it well could have been the usual Russian identity thieves and bots.
No. of Recommendations: 13
Dope1: And of course, here's some quotes...
We haven't seen this much panic since the Access Hollywood video. Somehow, I don't think a diversion is going to work this time around since this one involves sex with teenage girls but you go ahead and post endlessly because of course.
IOW, SQUIRREL!!!
No. of Recommendations: 4
We haven't seen this much panic since the Access H
LOLOLOLOL. Nice try, ChatNPC!
I have the documents. You have nothing.
No. of Recommendations: 7
Dope1: LOLOLOLOL. Nice try, ChatNPC!
I have the documents. You have nothing.
This seems like a teachable moment.
Go figure out the difference between “did not impact” -- as in, “Russian and criminal actors did not impact” recent US election results and “tried to, but failed”.
And Tulsi Gabbard has been a Russian stooge for-evah.
No. of Recommendations: 4
This seems like a teachable moment.
It is, but not in the way you think.
Go look at the source document I linked. You might learn something.
Then again...you won't.
Jokes on you, ChatNPC.
No. of Recommendations: 1
I hope they actually come out - for real - and conclusive.
The Establishment usually gets their way - one way or the other.
No. of Recommendations: 3
And boom. Tulsi just made the criminal referral to the DOJ.
https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/194629360097678545...Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people.
No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it.
We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral.Can’t wait to see…what was the term the libs always used…I got it:
Frog marched.
Whole bunch of libs from the Obama admin need lawyers.
And I’d love to see Obama deposed before their trials.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Will DOJ see it thru - is the question.
I'd love to know the Establishment is not in charge. I'd love to.
No. of Recommendations: 1
since this one involves sex with teenage girls
Since Bill Clinton was a regular guest of Epstein and has a history of sexual exploits
you must be talking about him.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Celebrating more fascist bullshit? Wow...good for you.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Since Bill Clinton was a regular guest of Epstein and has a history of sexual exploits
you must be talking about him.
They're pathetically desperate as usual.
So the WSJ drops a supposed bomb that contains...literally nothing. No pictures of this supposed thing, no analysis, nothing. They even admit they have no idea that it came from Trump or not.
And yet our usual suspects are all a-gaga over this despite ignoring for years the entirety of the Epstein thing (and, as you point out, Bill Clinton's involvement).
No matter. Pretty soon we're going to see the national spectacle of Barack Obama trying to claim executive privilege from testifying. I hope Trump extracts quite a bit from him in exchange for granting it.
Like giving up all of his henchmen.
And the cherry on top? Trump pardoning Obama. How awesome would that be?
No. of Recommendations: 4
Since Bill Clinton was a regular guest of Epstein and has a history of sexual exploits
you must be talking about him.
Perhaps Billy and Donnie will be cellmates.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Perhaps Billy and Donnie will be cellmates.
Where's the card?
We showed you ours. Now show us yours.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Oh, and there's another shoe that dropped.
America First Legal got ahold of some emails that paint an interesting picture of what Biden was willing to do to parents protesting at schools.
Heh.
AG Garland’s memo mobilized the full force of the federal government’s firepower against concerned parents—not to protect schools, but to silence dissent.”
Lawyer up, Team Biden.
No. of Recommendations: 3
And yet another shoe!
Pam Bondi just filed a motion to unseal the grand jury testimony in the Epstein.
See, it never was the federal government holding on to it. Federal Judge Richard M. Berman ordered the seal.
So many lib narratives dying off. And so quickly!
No. of Recommendations: 2
And the cherry on top? Trump pardoning Obama. How awesome would that be?
Well, Trump does have a soft spot and perhaps may consider Obama has has been suffering for years,
I mean, look to who Barack O is married to....Trump just might pardon Obama and his sentence
is to live the rest of his life with Michelle.
Now that’s Justice.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Trump does have a soft spot
Precisly where Melanie <g> landed (shall we say) lasting impacts. The judge will sentence Spankee to actually *live* with his wife for the rest of his life. Now THAT is entertainment !!!
No. of Recommendations: 17
Since Bill Clinton was a regular guest of Epstein and has a history of sexual exploits you must be talking about him.
It's not either/or. We can be talking about both. The Felon was adjudicated as a rapist. Clinton appears to have been a sexual predator.
I'm totally OK with Clinton going to prison if he did something with underage girls. Can you say the same about the Felon?
No. of Recommendations: 3
Now that’s Justice.
Oh, Michelle will divorce him in a couple of years.
The best part will be Obama and his ego living the rest of his life knowing that the only reason he's not in jail is...Trump.
No. of Recommendations: 8
Dope1: The best part will be Obama and his ego living the rest of his life knowing that the only reason he's not in jail is...Trump.
I know it's Friday night but Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints how drunk are you?
No. of Recommendations: 2
And yet another shoe!
Pam Bondi just filed a motion
Pam Bondi makes her own shoes, following the instructions of Donald Trump.
You haven’t figured that out?
They manufacture their own “evidence”.
No. of Recommendations: 6
"I'm totally OK with Clinton going to prison if he did something with underage girls. Can you say the same about the Felon?"
I feel the exact same way. I'll celebrate any and all pol's and celebrities doing hard time
if they're guilty of molesting young girls or boys. Don't give a shit whether they call
themselves Republicans or Democrats, if they're molesting youngsters, I hope they suffer
for their actions.
MAGA, on the other hand, they are contorting themselves into pretzels to somehow
wish away the guilt of Trump's molesting young girls. Pretty pathetic on MAGAs part,
but hey, it's exactly how I expect MAGA to react to this.
No. of Recommendations: 2
The Felon was adjudicated as a rapist.And that is a lie.
"Among the [Article] 130 claims are rape, sexual abuse and forcible touching," he said. "Therefore, in order for Ms. Carroll to prevail on the statute of limitations, she needed to prove [by a preponderance of the evidence] that she was the victim of rape or sexual abuse or forcible touching.
"Any one of the three would have sufficed. The jury found two of the three applied, but not rape."
While Trump was not found liable for rape, Tidmarsh said he attached "limited significance to the jury's decision not to find that rape occurred."
"The civil claim is for battery, not rape," he added. "The jury found that Donald Trump battered E. Jean Carroll. And Ms. Carroll was able to fit within the new statute of limitation even without proving rape."
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-tru...Ms Carroll case was about how much money she could squeeze out of Trump.
No. of Recommendations: 1
I'm totally OK with Clinton going to prison if he did something with underage girls. Can you say the same about the Felon?
If it should happen (but it wont)....Shrug, I can live with it.
I have a consolation prize waiting in the wings.
JD Vance will be President for the next eight years.
This harden Marine will be tougher than Trump.
Be careful what you wish for.
No. of Recommendations: 1
I know it's Friday night but Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints how drunk are you?
He must have spiked his oranger koolaid.
No. of Recommendations: 2
And yet another shoe!
Pam Bondi just filed a motion
LOL. Bondi IS the Deep State and the Weaponized Govt all rolled into one. Helping Trump turn our country into the Republic of Fascistsan.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Pam Bondi makes her own shoes, following the instructions of Donald Trump.
You haven’t figured that out?
They manufacture their own “evidence”.
More flailing. When you run out of table to pound all you can do is make up more claims.
You people really don’t know anything about the Epstein case, do you? After all…you didn’t give a rip for years about it.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Having a really bad week, aren’t we?
Me, I never get tired of winning.
No. of Recommendations: 3
The best part will be Obama and his ego living the rest of his life knowing that the only reason he's not in jail is...Trump.
So that's how they plant the hook, eh? That's how they want you to think - Trump got Obama and the libs got owned? To distract you and make you feel better about it?
No. of Recommendations: 5
I'm totally OK with Clinton going to prison if he did something with underage girls. Can you say the same about the Felon?
If Clinton goes to prison and Trump somehow squirms out of being tried, I'm not OK with it. If they both are tried, I'm OK with it. I'm OK with
Trump being tried and not Clinton, because Trump ran on releasing the Epstein files, so if doing that puts him in harms way, it's only fitting.
No. of Recommendations: 14
More flailing.
“Flailing” is what Trump has been doing since his pedophilia has been exposed.
“Flailing” is what you’ve been doing for the last week as you try to change the subject.
“Look here at Obama!” “Look here at Hillary!”, “Bill Clinton!” “Joe Biden!”
<flap flap>
But waving your arms and pointing at anyone else but Trump is a flailing and failing strategy that simply draws attention to the orange child raper you are attempting to hide with all the hand waving.
No. of Recommendations: 4
Having a really bad week, aren’t we?
Me, I never get tired of winning.
…… says the Black Knight.
Hear the bast of his voice and tremble as he shouts!
“It’s only a flesh wound!”
No. of Recommendations: 2
To distract you and make you feel better a
Feel better about what?
Distract from what?
You’re going to need to state an actual position on something one of these days.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Roll over and show me that belly. Such a good boy!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Flailing” is what Trump has been doing sin
Where’s the card?
No. of Recommendations: 2
Feel better about what?
Distract from what?
Hail to thee, blithe spirit.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Roll over and show me that belly. Such a good boy!
Your manosphere performance art is wearing thin.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Where’s the card
In your wallet. It reads:
“Please help me expand my horizons. I have intentionally blinded myself”
No. of Recommendations: 3
Your manosphere performance art is wearing thin.
Nah. Not really.
But your act here on the boards is reminiscent of a bad 3rd grade skit. It’s not even dinner theater anymore.
No. of Recommendations: 2
It reads: I don’t have any actual evidence, and everybody knows the only reason I’m pretending to care right now is because I’m powerless to stop Trump giving the majority of the country what it voted for and I can’t even.
I know. But you’re safe here in the bubble. Sorry that Colbert was canned. Maybe if he’d actually been funny…
