Post #25419 by ptheland on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (18)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 11

then the supporting evidence becomes integral.

Is it necessary to go through each individual porn site and hooker transaction, when the defendant has basically stipulated the expenses were personal by correcting the returns?

Or do you just want to hear them read aloud in court? Maybe for the public shaming? Should we force Hunter to wear a scarlet “A” on his shirts so everyone will know that he spent time with hookers?

Or do you just want to hear the names of the web sites because you’re looking for some new porn sites and hookers? For research purposes, of course.

—Peter

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (18)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.