Post #12668 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (164)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Why? What's the justification for refusing to grant asylum for someone who is, in fact, a legitimate asylee? - </i?

----------------

The same justification that will exist after the new law is in place. Except now there is a tool to do so. Controlling overwhelming migration was the justification and still is.

To use the new law means those turned away are being denied a hearing, something you think 100% are entitled to. I think this is OK because we are a sovereign country making a decision. You seem to extend some right to non citizens presently not in our country that if they come here they have a right to to make their case and it is a right we must honor under all circumstances.

The idea that "all migrants have a right" is unsustainable as more and more citizens are becoming aware of, thanks to the pioneering work done by Greg Abbott.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (164)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.