Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: BandonDunes   😊 😞
Number: of 19824 
Subject: Question on 13-F
Date: 11/16/25 10:20 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
I was just glancing at the recent 13F filing for Berkshire. I calculated that the top 15 positions represent 92.63 % of the portfolio while the bottom 26 represent the balance. The seemingly massive 400 million share stake in KO is now less than 10% of the portfolio! Hard to wrap my head around that one:)
In addition, they seem to tweak the tiny positions from time to time. For example:
Lamar Advertising (LAMR) represents .06 % of the portfolio yet added to their position by 2.79%
Lennar Corporation Class B (LEN.B) represents .01 % of the portfolio and they added to the stake by .03%

So, my question is: why even bother with these tiny stakes? And to add/trim these positions seems like child play:)

Hope everyone is having a nice weekend.

-BD

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds