Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: WatchingTheHerd HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 41590 
Subject: LA Times Refuses to Endorse a Candidate
Date: 10/23/2024 9:04 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
The LA Times announced it would not publish an editorial endorsing any candidate for President. In response, Mariel Garza, the editor of the newspaper's editorial page, promptly resigned in protest, stating:

"The non-endorsement undermines the integrity of the editorial board and every single endorsement we make, down to school board races. People will justifiably wonder if each endorsement was a decision made by a group of journalists after extensive research and discussion, or through decree by the owner."

That owner is Patrick Soon-Shiong, a surgeon / investor / businessman worth about $6 billion according to Wikipedia.

He's too rich to care if the LA Times goes out of businesss if subscribers abandon the paper in protest so it's hard to imagine any financial pressure that could be applied to alter this kind of thinking. Clearly shame doesn't apply if you cannot be persuaded to make a stand with a contrast as start as Harris versus Trump.

This is a fascinating illustration of the illusion that money buys independence and freedom. The illusion that money gives you lattitude to speak truth to power and not worry about your day to day existance being at risk. Given the behavior of many of America's multi-millionaires and billionaires, it seems a significant fraction haven't become more FREE with their limitless money. Instead, they've become more psychologically dependent upon it and more fearful of losing ANY of it, even if losing 99% of it still leaves them a multi-millionaire.

People like this are not hooked up right. Yet people like this are in control of the majority of media and "social network" platforms that are consistently warping virtually all information we take in to understand "reality." Why anyone in "steerage" (anyone worth less than a mere $10 million) would be allowing people this disconnected from reality to affect their positions is utterly baffling.


WTH

Print the post


Author: sano   😊 😞
Number: of 41590 
Subject: Re: LA Times Refuses to Endorse a Candidate
Date: 10/24/2024 8:58 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
NPR explained that
".... Soon-Shiong, like many media owners, has other business interests that can be directly affected by government actions. As a physician and medical inventor, Soon-Shiong has medical products subject to review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and applies for patents to federal regulators as well.

So.....

“Outlets from the Los Angeles Times to perhaps even the Washington Post are engaging in what the historian Timothy Snyder has called anticipatory obedience — pulling back from their obligation to tell the truth in order to placate the tyrant so he doesn’t come after them,” Protect Democracy's Bassin says.


Printing the truth about the major papers and networks, the PBS NPR funding is sure to be eliminated.


https://www.npr.org/2024/10/24/nx-s1-5163293/la-ti...
Print the post


Author: ebost   😊 😞
Number: of 41590 
Subject: Re: LA Times Refuses to Endorse a Candidate
Date: 10/25/2024 2:22 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
The Washington Post just declined to endorse. The Post seems to be the darkness where democracy dies.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds