Post #8575 by g0177325 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Cannon seems unable to pull out of the weeds and details and "abstract up" about the true nature of the crimes being alleged and the facts in the case required to prove those charges or defend against them. That's not merely the sign of a newbie judge getting their sea legs in court. That's a sign of a judge who is truly at sea, legally and logically speaking.

I think she's in way over her head. And incompetent to boot. I'd guess that Jack Smith is already ruing the fact that he didn't motion for her recusal months ago. This was the trial that should have been a slam dunk conviction, and it's looking like it will be the one that ultimately goes nowhere very very slowly.

In related news, it'd be nice if the special counsel investigating Joe Biden's retention of classified documents comes to a resolution and clears him definitively of any wrong doing. I think I read that we will know the outcome one way or the other by years end.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.