Post #13859 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

>>bhm: If this bill is just so very good for our country, why have one of its key provision self destruct after a short period."<<

Asked and answered numerous times by numerous posters. Sheesh. - sano

-----------------

And that answer seems to boil down to, "We need to see how well it is working and it may need tweaking after three years."

OK, but your justification for the sunset verbiage seems to be, sure because the closure provision may be to be modified in three years.

So it might. But why is an upfront cancellation feature necessary in order to modify it later?

I think the self cancel is in there because your side is fearful the emergency closure provision will work too well and the American people won't let you cancel it. So logically, you build in the self cancel as a way to cloak the "return to business as usual" outcome of the bill.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.