Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: velcher 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Trump's Partisan Redistribution of Wealth
Date: 10/23/25 3:05 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
In a broader sense, and despite his vindictive intentions, Trump’s economic project actually threatens red districts more than blue ones. His signature second-term domestic-policy package, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, slashes the Medicaid budget by close to $1 trillion, which means that hundreds of small-town hospitals in Appalachia and clinics in the Deep South might not be able to keep their doors open. Two of the three states expected to see the largest increases in their uninsured populations are Kentucky and Louisiana.

Right now, Republicans are extending the shutdown to deny insurance subsidies to families that purchase health coverage on the Affordable Care Act exchanges. If the GOP succeeds, an estimated 20 million households will see their premiums rise next year. South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah would be hardest hit, the Kaiser Family Foundation has estimated.

Trump’s trade war has functioned as a sales tax on every single American household. The average family will pay $1,800 more a year for groceries, clothing, and other common goods thanks to the tariffs. But manufacturers and farmers have so far borne the brunt of the pain. Input prices have soared: The costs of fertilizer, machinery, lumber, aluminum, steel, and auto parts have risen. Export demand has plunged as the United States’ trading partners have put retaliatory tariffs in place. The agricultural sector is in the midst of a quiet recession; the manufacturing sector is shedding jobs. Bright-red states such as Iowa, South Dakota, and Indiana are getting the worst of it.

Trump might want to use his executive power to damage the country’s blue islands and coastal elites, but the places he’s harming the most are the very ones that powered his rise. No one should feel any schadenfreude, however, because pain in red states will spill over into blue states, and pain in blue states will spill over into red ones. A farm failing in Iowa has a way of increasing the cost of breakfast in Los Angeles. A hospital closing in Louisiana means fewer job opportunities for health aides training in Seattle. A cut to heavy-infrastructure spending in New Jersey might depress sales for a machinery business in Ohio. An HHS office shutting down in San Francisco might mean falling IT spending in Virginia.

The country’s economy is more interconnected than Trump realizes, and its polity more indivisible than he might think too: There are more Republicans in California than there are in the Deep South. More Texans and Floridians voted for Kamala Harris than did residents of New England.

In the United States’ economy, there’s no way to separate “us” from “them.” When Trump signs bills that help the rich and hurt the poor, he ends up hurting everyone. When he punishes blue places, he damages red ones too. We’re in this together, whether Trump sees it that way or not. ——Annie Lowrey, The Atlantic Magazine
Print the post


Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Re: Trump's Partisan Redistribution of Wealth
Date: 10/23/25 4:51 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Rant #37 called out this policy, twenty years ago. Jack Kemp openly said this was the intended outcome of "supply side economics" thirty years ago. Take from the Proles, and give to the rich.

Trump says he wants to increase beef imports from Argentina, to help his crony. US beef ranchers cry foul. Who does Trump *really* care about? The ranchers are nothing but expendable meat. They are as expendable as every other Prole.

Steve...realized he was nothing to a "JC" but a ledger entry under "source of funds", long ago
Print the post


Author: UpNorthJoe   😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Re: Trump's Partisan Redistribution of Wealth
Date: 10/23/25 8:35 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
"Trump says he wants to increase beef imports from Argentina, to help his crony. US beef ranchers cry foul"

just got back from Costco. Walked thru the meat aisles: Wowzer !
1st time ever got sticker shock looking at beef prices !!!
The fish ( all types ) have also inflated up quite a bit.

Luckily, stocked up a month or so ago, freezer is full.
Deer season is here, and venison is actually healthier ( leaner ) than
beef anyways. So Trump and the ranchers can both go screw themselves, lol.

( it's not just beef that has inflated since Trump took over. Virtually
all food items look a lot more expensive compared to say December of 2024.
If people believe that stream of BS coming out of Trump's mouth about
lowering prices, then they fully deserve that bending-over they're getting )
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds