Post #25698 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

-His criminal conviction in New York, specifically why that conviction isn't disqualifying for a presidential candidate.
-Or his other open criminal cases, Georgia, DC federal court, FL federal court. Why aren't those disqualifying?
-How about his position on the 2020 election. He has claimed on a great many occasions that the election was stolen from him. Yet he cannot provide any evidence of that which has stood up to scrutiny in court? Why does he persist in his claims despite the lack of evidence?

I assume you mean "disqualifying for Mike". Because I don't think there's anything in the Constitution about that. In fact, I think you could be incarcerated and still run for POTUS as long as you're a natural born citizen over the age of 35.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.