Post #4615 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

The thing is, it is not a crime to dispute the results of an election no matter who is doing the disputing.

But it is a crime to call up a state official and demand "find me 11000 votes", or to interfere (or attempt to interfere) in the election process, etc. He's not up on charges for disputing it. He's up on charges for trying to influence/manipulate the results (and/or officials). From what I've seen (I haven't read the complaint, just summaries in the news).

I'm still expecting GA to go after him. They have him on tape asking to find him 11000 votes. That's pretty blatant.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.