Invite ye felawes and frendes desirous in gold to enter the gates of Shrewd'm, for they will thanke ye later.
- Manlobbi
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
No. of Recommendations: 22
Looks like about 19 days in a row that the A share price has been below the likely price of the buybacks on March 4, for at least part of the trading day. So I imagine they have been in the market buying, at least some.
I assumed that the buyback that day was around the average price of the day, which was about $729500.
For this purpose, a conversion of 1500:1 for B share buybacks doesn't seem to be appropriate. Management prefers A shares for buybacks and doesn't seem to buy B shares unless prices are both cheaper (relatively) and quite cheap (in an absolute sense, perhaps to take advantage of the liquidity to buy more shares). So I would NOT assume that management would be happy to buy B shares at 729500/1500. My guess is that a notional "happy with a B buyback at that time" might be more like (say) $475 per B instead of $486.
A share is worth more each day, so one might assume the target rises commensurably over time. But it probably also moves up and down even more sometimes with changing prospects of other opportunities, present and future.
Jim
No. of Recommendations: 1
For this purpose, a conversion of 1500:1 for B share buybacks doesn't seem to be appropriate. Management prefers A shares for buybacks and doesn't seem to buy B shares unless prices are both cheaper (relatively) and quite cheap (in an absolute sense, perhaps to take advantage of the liquidity to buy more shares). So I would NOT assume that management would be happy to buy B shares at 729500/1500. My guess is that a notional "happy with a B buyback at that time" might be more like (say) $475 per B instead of $486.
Wouldn't you expect arbitrage of some sort to close that gap whenever it's larger than, let's say, 2%?
Elan
No. of Recommendations: 1
Wouldn't you expect arbitrage of some sort to close that gap whenever it's larger than, let's say, 2%?
I'd expect arbitrage to keep the two share price ratios in the rough vicinity of the economic interest ratio of 1500:1, yes.
But that's a different question from what the preference of head office might be when contemplating buybacks on any given day. They prefer A shares. Wasn't a 3% premium mentioned in the owner's manual?
Jim
No. of Recommendations: 5
Looks like about 19 days in a row that the A share price has been below the likely price of the buybacks on March 4, for at least part of the trading day. So I imagine they have been in the market buying, at least some.I assumed that the buyback that day was around the average price of the day, which was about $729500.
21 days at $200M per day, could be $4.2B in buybacks. $220M/day = $4.6B
Gemini says $41.16B traded over the last 21 trading days. I did not verify.
I doubt they bought back 10% of volume though. Safe Harbor rules might allow up to 25% of daily volume.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Jim: For this purpose, a conversion of 1500:1 for B share buybacks doesn't seem to be appropriate. Management prefers A shares for buybacks and doesn't seem to buy B shares unless prices are both cheaper (relatively) and quite cheap (in an absolute sense, perhaps to take advantage of the liquidity to buy more shares). So I would NOT assume that management would be happy to buy B shares at 729500/1500. My guess is that a notional "happy with a B buyback at that time" might be more like (say) $475 per B instead of $486.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B $474.82 as I write...
No. of Recommendations: 2
"Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B $474.82 as I write..."
Since March 31st I've plunked down quite a lot on B's. I've made 8 transactions, Highest purchase price $477.95, lowest purchasing price $472.87
