Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48491 
Subject: Re: SCOTUS today
Date: 06/28/2024 3:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
A bad decision. You simply cannot administer the vast and complex modern US government without delegating rule-making to agencies. The laws are passed by Congress, but they are in no way capable of handling all the detailed rule making necessary to implement those laws.

The decision does not prohibit agencies from engaging in rule-making. It undoes the presumption of correctness that applies to their interpretation of statutes. Chevron said that where statutes are ambiguous, courts should defer to what the agencies thought those statutes meant, rather than trying to resolve the ambiguity independently. Rule-making wasn't at issue, except to the extent that rules are often the subject of these types of disputes.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds