Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75968 
Subject: Re: Democratic senators fear getting ‘hammered’
Date: 10/21/25 6:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
My idea was simply to abstain in the votes. Don't vote "yes" in support. Abstain. Then pummel the Reps about the ACA, and other things making their lives more difficult, next summer during the mid-term campaigns.

They can't really do that.

I mean, they could. They don't even need to abstain. The GOP has a majority, after all. They actually could all just vote against the bill in the Senate. As long as no one filibustered, the bill would pass by a simple 52-48 majority (Paul would vote against it, I think).

But that would never happen. There's no way they would ever get every single Democratic senator to agree not to filibuster.

If it's filibustered, then the Republicans need eight affirmative Democratic votes (again, assuming Paul votes against). Which means the Democrats have to affirmatively help them over the line.

The filibuster isn't based on senators present, but 3/5 of the entire membership of the Senate - so it's always 60 affirmative votes, no matter how many are in the chamber.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds