Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: suaspontemark ✶☼🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 22352 
Subject: Re: o/t, The Industrialization Of Fraud
Date: 10/06/26 9:46 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Intercst, on the other Fool board, detailed a situation where (one of?) his accounts was waylaid by someone opening an account in his name in another city, then transferring the bulk into the new location. Luckily caught in time and reversed. $900,000 oopsie! For those interested: discussion.fool.com - Big problem with vanguard

Not big problem with Vanguard, but several small ones led me to ditch them in about 2023-2024 for Schwab.

I'll see if I can remember them all...

1) They had the wrong contribution amount maximum for 401(k)s one year. If the authorized amount for the new pending year was $30k, they still had it at the prior year's amount. Hard wired into their website. My wife is plan admin and plan participant for her sole proprietorship's 401(k) so we're deep in the weeds in the mechanics of this. I called them and was rather bothered they had this wrong.

2) They farmed out their small business work to some poor reputation firm, forget the name but begins with A, around that timeframe. Too small of accounts for them to be bothered, I suppose. And they were going to charge a fee for some nonsense to move to the new administration company or such. That made the decision easy to move to Schwab.

3) Style drift - they were definitely hawking actively managed products. This really started, by my measure, after Bogle died. Like, I get the feels they were thinking internally "we can get higher fees after this old codger passes but we can't do this until he's gone because he fought against this for 40-50 years".

I am with Schwab, no issues with them and they never are hawking things to me. They present ideas sometimes, and sometimes I take them up on them (new tax loss harvesting brokerage account, for example this year, that uses algorithms - not AI - to make some buy/sell decisions and has pretty much tracked the S&P, and has reduced my tax bill by thousands). I think Fidelity and whoever owns E*Trade now are perfectly solid.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to suaspontemark here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,861 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 58 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 55 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community