Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro


Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: SuisseBear 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: 6-3 Scotus Decision Strikes Down Trump Tariffs
Date: 02/22/26 7:05 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
There's not a rat's @ss chance in h3ll that rapacious revenge-driven maniac will repay a DIME of tariffs. Hell, he didn't pay contractors that built his hotels! "So sue me."

Well there are 175 billion reasons to do exactly that :-)

Then again, the funds will likely end up in the pockets of JCs, rather than those of the consumers who paid the lion share.


Feb 20 (Reuters) - After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday that President Donald Trump lacked authority to impose tariffs under a law meant for use in national emergencies, litigation is expected to turn to the U.S. Court of International Trade, where companies have already hired an army of lawyers to help them recoup their tariff losses. Trade attorneys said the volume of cases seeking refunds for tariffs already imposed – more than 1,800 already – could surge now that the justices rejected the legal rationale behind an estimated $175 billion in U.S. customs revenue since last April. ...

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/law-firms...
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds