Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: Aussi 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 15492 
Subject: Re: Why Not O&G? Is it the IEA Energy Outlook_
Date: 07/14/2025 5:11 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
Texirsh

They assume 5-6% percent annual declines in existing fields. Yet newer production has much higher decline rates – ranging from 28% in the Permian to 13% in Brazil. XOM estimates the current decline rate to be closer to 15% without annual investments. This is a KEY point in projecting future oil supply needs.

Exxon has a high percentage of horizontal wells in tight formations so their decline will be higher. Most existing wells in the world are conventional, so a decline rate of 5-6% is reasonable.

With regard to their forecast, it may not be a political document but it is prepared by engineers who are subject to a subjective ranking system. After the initial estimates of future demand, it is reviewed by first line supervisors. The initial question is "are the assumptions inline with senior management viewpoints ". At that point the assumptions are massaged to match the employee incentive system and the report is passed upwards with similar ongoing questions.

Aussi who worked for XOM for 25 years and then as a consultant for another 5 years.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds