Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BYDDY | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BYDDY
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BYDDY | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BYDDY


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / BYD (BYDDY)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Post New
Author: rnam   😊 😞
Number: of 1113 
Subject: Vibe Coding a Word Processor
Date: 02/24/26 2:10 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
For decades I’ve chiselled through the thick accretion of features encrusting mass-market commercial writing software. I’ve foisted intricate templates upon Pages, saddled Docs with third-party browser extensions and mostly avoided Word. I’d also tried a string of boutique editors that were appealing in some ways and lacking or gimmicky in others.

Over a single weekend, entirely from scratch and heavily “vibe coded”, I created by some distance the best word processor I have ever used. I’ve named it vibedit. I’m writing in it right now. If there is an actually productive task for generative AI, it is as a creator of bespoke tools like this. Given this new, relative ease of app development, it is easy to imagine the atomisation of software into a mist of customised personal projects, droplets as numerous as users.

Aside from the software product, the experience had other benefits. I felt at liberty from corporate design, and could easily amend my own app as I thought of additions and deletions. And far from removing me from my work, this AI experience forced me to think carefully about how I work, and how to craft a fitting tool. I was also confronted as any craftsperson should be by the minutiae of my tools — technicalities like stream parsing, dirty state tracking, debouncing and atomicity. I have since built a second app devoted to task management, another erstwhile source of daily frustration.

https://www.ft.com/content/071b2770-5106-4530-a290... (subscription required.)

If a non software engineer could create a personal word processor and task management app so easily, I believe software giants like Microsoft, Adobe, CRM et al are in serious trouble.
Print the post


Author: albaby1 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 1113 
Subject: Re: Vibe Coding a Word Processor
Date: 02/24/26 3:54 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
Over a single weekend, entirely from scratch and heavily “vibe coded”, I created by some distance the best word processor I have ever used. I’ve named it vibedit. I’m writing in it right now. If there is an actually productive task for generative AI, it is as a creator of bespoke tools like this. Given this new, relative ease of app development, it is easy to imagine the atomisation of software into a mist of customised personal projects, droplets as numerous as users.

I mean...not really? I can't imagine very many people bothering to spend a weekend creating their own word processor from scratch. Professional writers, and specifically the subset of professional writers who have extremely idiosyncratic preferences and needs for a word processor, might do so. But most folks are still going to use a program that someone else has made.

The real unraveling of software isn't going to come from AI enabling home hobbyists whipping up their own homebrew version of the WordPerfect they used to know and love.

Instead, it's more likely to come from AI dramatically lowering the cost of entry for competing developers to create their own word processors. Making a competing WP product that could take on Word has historically been a massive undertaking. But if it could be done by a few folks spending a couple of weeks really nailing the vibe-coding to come up with a better mousetrap, then suddenly Word faces a lot more competition.

So now any developer is able to spend their time coming up with a WP that might be better than Word in some given way that a consumer might find important - or even just cheaper, while still being better than the free word processors like Google Docs. Nearly all folks aren't going to want to make their own word processor, but plenty might be willing to give that new WP that's been circulating around a whirl.
Print the post


Author: weatherman   😊 😞
Number: of 1113 
Subject: Re: Vibe Coding a Word Processor
Date: 02/24/26 7:36 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
[suggest we move this thread to STEM]

somewhat agree.
i have hundreds of software functions that dont exist where\when\how i want them. and no one is going to make $ selling these for a TAM of ~1.
on the flipside, i did try to make some of these in 2025 versions of AI. all failed.
in case AI can now compensate for my bad prompting skills, its time to try again. and so will many more eventually.

but this increased amateur use does not lead to money for the AI makers either.
to paraphrase a hilarious interweb analysis from shrub :
"this new generation of AI means never have i needed so little effort to make a [free] useless AI video that cost sam altman so much in operating costs"




Print the post


Author: mungofitch SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 113 
Subject: Re: Vibe Coding a Word Processor
Date: 02/25/26 11:36 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
If a non software engineer could create a personal word processor and task management app so easily, I believe software giants like Microsoft, Adobe, CRM et al are in serious trouble.

I was also quite impressed with the article. More specifically, his accomplishment which the article describes, and the surprising power of the tools he used.

But FWIW, he's not exactly a techno-peasant.
Before joining the FT, he was a Nieman fellow at Harvard studying artificial intelligence and a senior writer at FiveThirtyEight. Roeder holds a PhD in economics with a focus on game theory ...

Most "non software engineers" would not comment "I was also confronted as any craftsperson should be by the minutiae of my tools — technicalities like stream parsing, dirty state tracking, debouncing and atomicity.

Jim

Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
BYD FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BYDDY | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds