It is as difficult to sink a business without debt as it is sink a ship without holes.
- Manlobbi
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 7
Here, they talk about whether Joe Biden was a "differentiating component" for Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners and if the Bidens were pursuing funding from China, with representative Biggs casting for the big fish...
Mr. Biggs: Did you or your partners design or seek to use political influence to help you raise capital or further your business?
Mr. Archer: I would -- can I answer it with a --
Mr. Biggs: Yes. Of course.
Mr. Archer: We would discuss having, you know, an understanding of D.C., and that was a differentiating component of us being able to raise capital. So we would -- it wasn't as, you know, specific as, okay, you know, just down to individuals or, you know, the Vice President's son. But, obviously, the brand carried. Because we'd say, you know, what gives you a unique advantage to start up Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners or Rosemont Realty? And that was just, you know, you're in a competitive environment out there trying to raise capital for various investment initiatives, and you would say, "Okay, well, we have a D.C. office." I mean, I think a lot of -- pretty much every, you know, bank and --
Mr. Biggs. Did you -- did you --
Mr. Archer: -- firm would do the same.
Mr. Biggs: I'm sorry. I didn't want to cut you short.
Mr. Archer: Yeah, no worries.
Mr. Biggs: Did you intimate ever that that would give you some kind of unique access, as you were meeting with clients or businesses, unique access because of the familial relationship that Hunter Biden had with his father, at that time the Vice President?
Mr. Archer: Yeah, again, I think I answered that in the same -- in -- before. Yes, we would say we had unique understanding of D.C. and how it operates and how that, you know, could positively reflect on the terms of our business. So, yes.
Mr. Biggs: Thank you.
QUESTION: Did Hunter Biden ever indicate to you that soliciting Chinese investments -- Chinese investments -- was important to his family, and particularly with reference to his father?
Mr. Archer: Soliciting Chinese investments in what regards? Raising capital for --
Mr. Biggs: Yeah.
Mr. Archer: So, with BHR, we weren't responsible -- we didn't have a fundraising capacity. We were out -- we were deal-sourcing for the initial -- that's what we're talking about generally, BHR? Or -- I don't have much -- I don't have anything --
Mr. Biggs: Yeah, I would say BHR.
Mr. Archer: Yeah. So BHR Partners, it was a cross-border fund -- you know, Bohai Sea Industrial Fund, Harvest. They were setting up a private equity fund, and they wanted to go out and buy -- you know, basically buy assets outside of China.
Mr. Biggs: But did --
Mr. Archer: So we didn't raise capital from the Chinese.
Mr. Biggs: Okay, but the crux of the question is, did Hunter Biden ever talk to you about how important that relationship with China was to his family, particularly to his father?
Mr. Archer: No, not -- not -- not specifically. No.
No. of Recommendations: 2
LOL. What's your point in posting all the 'ummms' and 'ahhhhs'?
Do you think the Chinese never paid the Bidens?
Even the WaPoo calls BS on that one:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/washington...Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler slapped President Biden with "Four Pinocchios" over his false claim that his son Hunter never made money from China.
Kessler began Tuesday's fact-check of the president by revisiting comments he made in both presidential debates in 2020 when he repeatedly denied claims that Hunter did business with China.
"But now, nearly three years later, Biden's assertions have been directly rebutted by Hunter himself," Kessler wrote. "In court testimony last week, the younger Biden acknowledged that he in fact had been paid substantial sums in China ' the first official confirmation that this was the case."You guys aren't skilled enough with the language to try to blow by the difference between 'raise capital from the Chinese' and the
fact had been paid substantial sums in China.
Grade? Fail.
But do keep highlighting the ways the msm losers are trying to convince the NPC's there's no there, there.
drip.
drip.
drip.
No. of Recommendations: 2
So basically HB had his typical bad behavior and made money off his father's name and reputation, but none of it ties to Joe, it's still all innuendo.
In the meantime we now have an indictment against Trump for his Jan 6 wrongdoings: Trump for conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding as he tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election and install himself in office over the wishes of the American people.
Slllooowwwwllllyyyy it turns, inch by inch, step by step...
Fani will be up soon... ;P
No. of Recommendations: 1
Dope: "Do you think the Chinese never paid the Bidens?"
More misinformation. Oh wait... it's "just a question."
'Bidens' is plural.
'his son Hunter' is singular.
The article does not say payment was made to "Bidens."
drip.
drip.
drip.
Such persistent dripping might be the clap, a plausible excuse for that confusion.
Neurosyphilis
At any stage, syphilis can spread and, among other damage, cause damage to the brain and nervous system and the eye.
No. of Recommendations: 2
So basically HB had his typical bad behavior and made money off his father's name and reputation, but none of it ties to Joe, it's still all innuendo.
Sure. If one believes in 1,000 coincidences and ignores the text that Hunter sent to the Chinese.
No evidence a'tall!
drip
Dripp
Drippppppp'.
No. of Recommendations: 4
A straight forward, no spin assessment :
Hunter Biden business associate testifies he has no knowledge of wrongdoing by Joe Biden
Hunter Biden's business associate, Devon Archer, testified before the House Oversight Committee that he has no knowledge that then-Vice President Joe Biden changed U.S. foreign policy to help his son and that he's not aware of any wrongdoing by the elder Biden, according to transcripts of his testimony released Thursday.
No. of Recommendations: 2
If one believes in 1,000 coincidences
You mean the 100,000 instances on Trump?
Fani's up next, and that's real. inch by inch, step by step...
No. of Recommendations: 10
Abbe Lowell, who is one of Hunter Biden's attorneys, made the statement in a letter to Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, which has interviewed the whistleblowers. The letter was obtained by NBC News...
Lowell writes that the screenshots of the message as tweeted by Smith, 'both include a photo of Mr. Biden not from 2017 but from the White House Easter Egg roll in April 2022 (long after the purported message was sent); both images portray the message in a blue bubble, when WhatsApp messages are in green; one image super-imposed the Chinese flag for the contact ID, when surely that was not how a text or contact was kept; and one purports to be a screenshot with the '. . .' of someone composing a text (as in Apple's iMessage) when that does not happen on WhatsApp.'
He writes, 'In short, the images you circulated online are complete fakes.'
I don't talk that much with ya Dope. If something is pointed out to be a fake, and it looks very much like it is, do you dismiss it? Are you level headed enough to do that? Or if I talk to you are you going to continually bring up disproven bunk from the past just because it fits your narrative and you need ammo cause you're running out?
No. of Recommendations: 1
You mean the 100,000 instances on Trump?
No, I mean the subject of THIS thread, which is the Biden crime family. You're choosing not to believe any of it, which is your choice.
No. of Recommendations: 1
I don't talk that much with ya Dope. If something is pointed out to be a fake, and it looks very much like it is, do you dismiss it? Are you level headed enough to do that? Or if I talk to you are you going to continually bring up disproven bunk from the past just because it fits your narrative and you need ammo cause you're running out?
Oh, wow. If their attorney says it, it must be true...
Right back at you. You seem like a decent person, but you harbor some very deep prejudices against right of center posters and they creep out from time to time. Are you able to overcome that and have an honest conversation? It's hard to do that when your inner feelings are asking you to discount facts...
No. of Recommendations: 8
<I don't talk that much with ya Dope. If something is pointed out to be a fake, and it looks very much like it is,
do you dismiss it? Are you level headed enough to do that? Or if I talk to you are you going to continually bring
up disproven bunk from the past just because it fits your narrative and you need ammo cause you're running out?>
Of course he's gonna continually bring up disproven bunk because it fits his narrative.
He gets schooled on a topic daily, then he quickly moves on to the next right-wing conspiracy theory, Fox News style!
I'm sure he's a fine person, but his inability to think critically has landed him in a CULT.
"One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
If you've been bamboozled long enough, you tend to reject
any evidence of the bamboozle. You're no longer interested
in finding the truth. The bamboozle has captured you.
It's simply too painful to acknowledge, even to yourself,
that you've been taken.
Once you give a charlatan power over you,
you almost never get it back." ~Carl Sagan
