Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Post New
Author: WEBLUNCHx2   😊 😞
Number: of 15061 
Subject: What Am I Missing? Please help!
Date: 07/10/2024 10:53 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Please explain to me what I'm missing in regards to BRK's current valuation.
If there are $400 Billion in securities, and $200 Billion in cash, doesn't that mean that you are getting the railroad, the utilities, the insurance operation and all the other business that are generating $35 Billion in free cash flow for $250 Billion? Please explain what I'm missing.
Print the post


Author: longtimebrk   😊 😞
Number: of 15061 
Subject: Re: What Am I Missing? Please help!
Date: 07/11/2024 5:58 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Berkshire is over capitalized any way you look at it. I track the below

Apple was probably sold down further in Q2 but for now assume it hasn't been

AAPL as a % of BRK market cap = 20.6%

AAPL + cash as a % of BRK market cap = 41.8%

All equity + cash as a % of BRK market cap = 67%

Equity as a % of BRK market cap = 46%

Of course the approximate $200 billion of cash has claims against in primarily from future insurance claims.

Any debt within the subs will be managed within them and is considered as part of their respective valuations.

Print the post


Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 15061 
Subject: Re: What Am I Missing? Please help!
Date: 07/11/2024 12:36 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 23
Please explain to me what I'm missing in regards to BRK's current valuation.
If there are $400 Billion in securities, and $200 Billion in cash, doesn't that mean that you are getting the railroad, the utilities, the insurance operation and all the other business that are generating $35 Billion in free cash flow for $250 Billion?


One word: liabilities.

If you sold all the assets that Berkshire owns, to a first approximation you would get only about $571 billion.
You'd raise on the order of a trillion, but you'd have debts and other liabilities to pay off, around $490 billion.
(using the rough-and-ready approximation that book value is about what you'd raise)

It sounds extreme, but that's the difference: you can't just add up the assets, you have to subtract the debt. That includes simple debt, debt in consolidated subsidiaries, deferred tax liabilities mostly on appreciated equities, and float: if you wound things down, you would gradually have to pay out all that float pile as claims.

A slightly more realistic version would be to sell things off as going concerns. It's better to sell See's as an active profitable chocolate maker, not sell off their machinery and close them down.

(1) You can estimate what the railroad would sell for by using comps, and it would keep its own debt through that transaction.
(2) Same with the utilities.
(3) Sell the wholly owned operating subsidiaries (MS&R) debt free based on a simple multiple of trend earnings, using a multiple appropriate to the trajectory of earnings and ROE.
(4) The insurance operation is above average, so figure on a slightly above average price-to-book for that. Allocate to the insurance unit a typical minimum amount of excess capital by taking things from the pile of investments, starting with the fixed income.
(5) For the remaining investments beyond what you'd sell off with the insurance unit (cash, fixed, and equities), it's easy to estimate the liquidation value after tax. From that liquidated "remaining securities" pile, deduct the debt at the top level of the corporation.

This is better, but still not very suitable. I don't think this is a hugely helpful exercise since the firm *won't* be broken up and sold off.
Consequently I believed it's better off valued based on
(a) How big is the pile of assets on which I'm earning money year in and year out? Investments and operating businesses are effectively the same in this view.
(b) What net after tax return on that pile am I seeing, and
(c) How fast are the earnings increasing on trend?

In this "going concern" view the float is not seen a liability, because we *do* get the return on the investments backing that float liability more or less forever.
But a lot of the investments will forever be earning nothing on average in real terms, so I value some fraction of them at zero...without a return they don't count in category (a) above. The amount I knock off is not equal to the cash pile, I use a function of the size of the insurance operation which is the reason for needing some no-return assets.

Jim
Print the post


Author: Munger_Disciple   😊 😞
Number: of 15061 
Subject: Re: What Am I Missing? Please help!
Date: 07/11/2024 1:08 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
One word: liabilities

Spot on! There are these pesky things called insurance liabilities and debt.
Print the post


Author: WEBLUNCHx2   😊 😞
Number: of 15061 
Subject: Re: What Am I Missing? Please help!
Date: 07/11/2024 4:26 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Thank you for taking the time to explain this.
Much appreciated!
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds