Post #26537 by Lambo on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Many of those cases were dismissed for lack of standing and the claimed evidence was not subjected to judicial review

That's more of a commentary on your attorneys, you know, the same ones who filed the other ones that were tossed out with judicial review. If you thought they had real merit, you would have found a qualified local and refiled. Your evidence was bunk.

Nobody is suggesting walking off with any original data, scheduled inspections in a secure facility should be adequate.

Sure, we'll schedule them after the election - say Jan 8th? But that's a state thing, not Fed.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.