Post #37734 by Lambo on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

We agree on the first.

If someone stands on some sort of personal principal that as President you don't have the right to know and should not even be asking, well that sort of arrogance means you need to resign right away before you are fired.

Here is where I differ with you. If the President was there - no problem, but the President wasn't there. It looked like there was no notice for one, two - clearances? They walked in unannounced, and it wasn't clear, but it seemed none of them had the proper clearances. So I bet you, that even though those 2 fellows were put on paid leave, that in the meantime there was a scramble to 1. get them the proper clearances, 2 think through what level of clearance they needed, and 3. verify with the White House that they were there on orders from the President.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.