Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Post New
Author: hclasvegas   😊 😞
Number: of 15055 
Subject: Warren Buffett watch, for those who
Date: 02/17/2024 7:33 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
might not get this. https://link.cnbc.com/public/34384388
Print the post


Author: hclasvegas   😊 😞
Number: of 15055 
Subject: Re: Warren Buffett watch, for those who
Date: 02/17/2024 7:42 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
"" A sizable increase in both percentage (+14.4%) and dollars (almost $2.4 billion) for Chevron, but it follows four straight quarters of declines from 165 million shares as of September 30, 2022. Berkshire's 126 million shares are currently valued at almost $19 billion, which is about 5% of the portfolio's total value."" Anyway, for Americans who have been regulated by the SEC, NASDAQ, and state security regulator's, IF I was aggressively trading a stock , I wouldn't have private three hours meetings with its CEO etc. If you have never dealt with the American securities regulator's you might not get it, and that's fine.
Print the post


Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Warren Buffett watch, for those who
Date: 02/17/2024 11:27 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 28
IF I was aggressively trading a stock , I wouldn't have private three hours meetings with its CEO etc. If you have never dealt with the American securities regulator's you might not get it, and that's fine.

I think perhaps you don't really understand the rule.
And yes, I have been a registered insider at more than one public company. In more than one country, for that matter.

You can have discussions all you want. For example, that's how deals get negotiated.

Overgeneralizing a bit, to break the rules all of the following would have to be true:
* there has to be an actual thing going on within the company (most frequently big bad news or an agreed M&A event, but not just an idea or normal day to day business)
* it has to be material
* disclosed to someone outside the firm who is not within the circle of the firm's insiders (in this context legal "insiders" can include non-employees)
* not yet publicly disclosed

There is no indication that ANY of those is true in this situation.

Jim
Print the post


Author: nola622   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Warren Buffett watch, for those who
Date: 02/17/2024 12:58 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Yes, Jim has it right of course. And this Warren Buffett character is not a total newbie in these matters either.
Print the post


Author: hclasvegas   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Warren Buffett watch, for those who
Date: 02/17/2024 1:20 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Can you remind of us of one of the many reasons Buffett gave for not buying msft? Thank you.
Print the post


Author: Calguy489   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Warren Buffett watch, for those who
Date: 02/17/2024 1:48 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Technically Buffett/Berkshire bought the stock in 2001 when New England Asset Management purchased it thru GEN RE stock's portfolio.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds