Post #27338 by wzambon on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

But my take is since the merits of the case can't be decided until after the election but releasing the prosecutions necessarily one sided version of the events before the election is purposeful election interference.

Would have come sooner, had it not been for the roadblocks thrown up by Trump’s lawyers and the Supreme Court’s thumb on the scale.

Tump didn’t want any of this stuff to come out-ever.

As it is, he was only able to delay it till now, and unfortunately for him, only one side of the legal contest is in the public domain.

Sucks to be him.

Bill Z

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.