Post #1992 by Timer321 on the Macroeconomic Trends and Risks board

Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

But most voters nationwide are unwilling to bear more than a tiny amount of cost to reduce climate emissions.

49.8% not over 50%

I would not call that most.

The Senate is a bad measure.

House seats? That flips back and forth. As 2022 showed us, most folks want to ease off on fossil fuels. The true big beautiful acts of 2022.

Fewer people voted in 2024 compared to 2020. 2020 was a landslide.

Where are you getting your "majority"? I do not see it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.