Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Colorado Gift
Date: 12/21/2023 2:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Could not Biden raise the question of standing in the original filing? Even if I can, and win that way, I would consider it too risky to not address the issue presented about the jelly beans. So I'd do both.

Yes - he certainly would, and that's the point.

In the initial suit, the plaintiff doesn't have standing. The plaintiff has no interest or injury from whether Biden has jellybeans on his desk, so the suit should be dismissed because the party has no standing. But if the court ignores that and issues against an order against Biden, then Biden does have standing to bring the appeal. Because unlike the initial plaintiff, he now does have an interest or injury that can be adjudicated.

So now that the CO electors have won their lawsuit, Trump has a very concrete interest or injury to adjudicate in the federal courts. He will have no difficulty establishing his standing to bring the appeal.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds