Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: jerryab ✺  😊 😞
Number: of 4582 
Subject: Re: Trump threatens a Tariff Tantrum
Date: 08/26/25 4:57 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
if the citizens of a state refuse to tax themselves for roads, or schools, or adequate police, why does funding those activities automatically become the Federal government's problem?

If the problems were LIMITED TO THAT STATE/COUNTY/CITY, then the above claim MIGHT make a vague sort of sense. But, it is "national" issue when things need to be able to almost anywhere quickly and readily, with few problems. With a patchwork of essentially unpassable roadways and more, that threatens the everyone in the nation, not just those who live where "they don't want to pay". Yet, guess what? If THEY get attacked or need help, they want FEDERAL HELP AND BAILOUT NOW !! So the federal govt taxes them as everyone else gets taxed. In other words, insurance spreading the cost of national risks to all citizens. If the people don't like it, nothing stops them from leaving the US and moving to where they do NOT have to pay for those costs. Where would that be? Good question. MAGA stays in the US because they are TOO AFRAID to go anywhere else. Which is why the wealthy do NOT have their own country--with no taxes, etc. Can they afford it? NO !! Why ?? Because the wealth REQUIRE a massive base from which they can take assets and give to themselves. If they do NOT have that base (which would NOT exist in "their own country"), they would have to pay for EVERYTHING out of their own pockets. They would go broke VERY quickly. Thus, the wealthy are the definition of Welfare Queens. Always have been. Always will be.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to jerryab here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,576 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community