No. I remember this one - the judge questioned the deal because it looked like Hunter Biden attorneys might think he got immunity to some things that he didn't get immunity to - which she thought was unethical and didn't want to do it because of that. - Lapsody

------------------------

No - I remember this one too. The judge discovered a broad grant (crimes still under investigation, crimes not yet discovered, that sort of thing) of immunity for Hunter deep in the fine print of some supporting document, something she apparently wasn't supposed to find. When she questioned the attorneys about support, ie precedent, for such a broad grant, they couldn't cite any. Hunters attorney's thought they had agreed to broad immunity but the prosecutors couldn't defend that to judge, so it was out. Hunter would not agree to the plea agreement without it meeting his understanding of granting broader immunity, so they parties were at an impasse and Hunter rather than pleading guilty under plea agreement entered a plea of not guilty.

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.