Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (57) |
Author: mungerish   😊 😞
Number: of 19824 
Subject: Re: Bogle , back to the real world,
Date: 01/23/26 4:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Let's say Charlie Munger was an extremist when it came to concentration. He thought you were perfectly well diversified if you owned 3 great assets you really knew something about.

Have you ever looked at Berkshires holdings and subtracted the Ted/Todd and or Lou Simpson holdings. He has huge positions in generally 5-8 names...and that's with all those billions. Now of course,we do have 70+ operating companies, but that's a different game. With the operating companies he's running a museum for business owners who don't want to see if broken up and sold off.

I have the exact quote at my office, but he essentially said this:
In a 2008 discussion (echoing similar sentiments from earlier years, like 1998), Buffett emphasized concentration for skilled investors:

He and Charlie Munger "operated mostly with five positions."
If he were running $50 million, $100 million, or $200 million, he would put 80% of the money in five positions, with the largest single position at around 25%. JPGSX is bigger than that now, but I would argue the same concentration principles basically apply.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (57) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds