Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Trump's "fraud" in NY
Date: 03/13/2024 9:33 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
So let's look for something that's sold. One block down from your example, we have a home that just sold a few days ago. Also for $27.5 million, coincidentally - but this one is improved with a 12,000 square foot mansion on it and is on four acres:

$29M on 4 acres. You understand that if I take this as the baseline, it still makes the judge look bad?
(MaL on 17 would be $123M).

Perhaps because Mar-A-Lago is encumbered with a historic preservation easement, which prohibits not only changing the exterior (which is burdensome but common for single-family residential historic properties), but also portions of the interior? Or the deed restriction which prohibits it being used for anything but a private club, which is an extraordinary burden on the Property?

Yeah, because nobody would buy it as a resort.

So the Property Appraiser got the appraised value approximately right for your example - but is off by 1800% for Mar-A-Lago?

Ahem.
Market value /= appraised value. When a property sells, then the two are one and the same but not before.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds