Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Post New
Author: ajm101   😊 😞
Number: of 21109 
Subject: Berkshire indirectly gave SpaceX $30B
Date: 06/06/26 12:57 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/05/google-will-pay-...

I would prefer to not be this cynical, but it's hard to see the facts otherwise. Quoting someone on a technical forum's analysis:

Google purchased 10% of SpaceX over a decade ago. After dilution they probably own around 5%.

SpaceX is valued at a whopping 94x revenue. This deal increases SpaceX's revenue by $11 billion per year. If SpaceX maintains this revenue multiplier, then this single deal boosts SpaceX's valuation by 94 x 11 billion = $1 trillion dollars. Google owns 5% of SpaceX, so they make 50 billion dollars. Google spends 10 billion and makes 50 billion, $40 billion profit.

The even better part is that because of this deal, SpaceX is now profitable. The S&P requires companies to demonstrate 12 months of profits before they can enter the S&P 500 index. SpaceX lobbied to have this profitability requirement removed, but S&P said no and refused to rewrite the rules.

Now with this incredible deal, SpaceX is now GAAP profitable under the existing rules, and they get to join the index next year without a rule change.


As a reply comment noted:

Off the top of my head, there is a very well established business involving buying expensive things and leasing them to the companies that intend to operate them so they can sell services: aircraft leasing.

AER is the biggest player and they have a P/E ratio of, drumroll please, 6. And I expect that GPUs, despite currently looking like an appreciating asset, will actually depreciate faster than aircraft in the long run.


I don't think retail or less sophisticated institutional analys will see it that way, even though it is accurate. Buying a few warehouses, reinforcing the floor and climate control, and putting a few billion dollars worth of Nvidia hardware in it is not a durable, high ROI, wide-moat business worth a high multiple but they will get one (maybe not 94x revenue, but I expect it will be substantial). SpaceX at this point is more of a REIT or leasing company. In 2025 they reported just under $20B in revenue between launch services and Starlink. Now the Anthropic Collosus lease and Google's lease under similar terms - I believe for Collosus 2 - have more doubled that revenue. And because of this investment round and the feedback loop from the small float that will kick in after SPX inclusion (possible now, with GAAP profitability), they may be become one of the most highly valued companies in history.

Since money is fungible, I assume this is viable because of the equity raise that BRK anchored. Google's 5% share will be worth $100B+, which will end up benefiting BRK's holdings. It is clever. I feel a little dirty about Berkshire's involvement, but I suppose someone else would have signed the check.
Print the post


Author: mungofitch SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21109 
Subject: Re: Berkshire indirectly gave SpaceX $30B
Date: 06/06/26 1:14 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
Google spends 10 billion and makes 50 billion, $40 billion profit...

Oddly enough, I was in this position personally once upon a time. I owned a sufficient quantity of a publicly listed firm, trading at such a high multiple of sales, that if I had sent them a cheque and the multiple held, my shares would have gone up more in value than the money I sent them. Ah, the internet bubble, great times.

No, I didn't do it. Over a certain ownership percentage the legally required lockup terms get more onerous, and I quite sensibly didn't believe the revenue multiplier would last anywhere near that long. It didn't, in fact the firm was bust in under two years.

Jim
Print the post


Author: ajm101   😊 😞
Number: of 21109 
Subject: Re: Berkshire indirectly gave SpaceX $30B
Date: 06/06/26 1:30 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...
Print the post


Author: abromber   😊 😞
Number: of 21109 
Subject: Re: Berkshire indirectly gave SpaceX $30B
Date: 06/07/26 9:13 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
The WSJ has a very good interview/podcast with Aswath Damodaran, the "Dean of Valuation" from NYU, on the valuation of SpaceX, the IPO, and implications for the market. He looks at SpaceX like a business (actually three businesses), and values them in a couple of different ways, using facts and figures. Has positive and negative things to say about Musk as a CEO. Bottom line: SpaceX is way overvalued, but so are a lot of things in the market these days. Probably good for trading, but not as a long-term investment.

I found the podcast very helpful to get a perspective on the giant IPOs we will see this year. Plus, it gave me something interesting to listen to while waiting for the World Cup to start and the Knicks to win the NBA finals. P.S. They mention BRK's recent investment in GOOG, but only in passing. Onward!

https://www.wsj.com/business/what-the-dean-of-valu...

abromber
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds