Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: "Cut Large Numbers of People Out"
Date: 10/03/25 9:31 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3

Then, as if recognizing that he had just proved the Democrats’ point, he added a non sequitur: “We don’t want to do that, but we don’t want fraud, waste, and abuse, and you know we’re cutting that.”

I remember a line like that. It went something along the lines of "I know where we could get the money, but it would be wrong".

they are agencies that provide services and protections for all Americans.

That is what makes them "bad". In Shinyland, the only "good" agencies are the ones that take from the Proles, and give to the "JCs". Anything that benefits the Proles is socialistical, therefore "bad". As I heard Jack Kemp say, years ago, words to the effect "the rich do all the saving and investing, so the rich should have all the money". The news reported, a day or two ago, that the EPA and Labor Departments were riffing the largest portions of their staff, something like 70-80%.

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds