Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: onepoorguy   😊 😞
Number: of 75963 
Subject: Re: Richard Feynman explains why Mars a one way trip
Date: 04/06/26 4:38 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
And there it is. “We can’t”.

You want to know the difference between those who want to see us head out to the stars and those who want to stay put?

Those 2 words. Says it all.


He said we "can't...with any currently-existing technology". That is absolutely correct. He did not speculate on future technologies.

I worked on an atmospheric Cerenkov detector for my grad work. We measured -among other characteristics- energies. We cannot at this time shield against particles of those energies. And organic tissue would not fare well with bombardments of those energies (TeV).

Well...we can shield if we start digging. Hard to take a cave into space, though. Albaby mentioned a moonbase. It would have to be sub-lunar. Not sure how many meters, but I would guess at least 10 meters. Otherwise the inhabitants would get their DNA shredded. The few realistic designs I have seen for such an installation usually had the water tanks above the habitation to increase shielding.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds