Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro


Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Post New
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 3853 
Subject: A real risk to US stocks
Date: 01/07/26 8:05 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/67633
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/07/politics/trump-...

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to cap executive pay at major US defense contractors and ban shareholder dividends and stock buybacks, accusing the industry of prioritizing profits over production speed.

“Defense Contractors are currently issuing massive Dividends to their Shareholders and massive Stock Buybacks, at the expense and detriment of investing in Plants and Equipment,” Trump wrote in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform.

Trump said defense company executives would be barred from earning more than $5 million annually until they build new manufacturing facilities and accelerate delivery of military equipment.

Trump argued that “as high as it sounds,” $5 million “is a mere fraction of what they are making now.”

While the exorbitant compensation of US CEO's is not necessarily in the stock holder's best interest, the fact that the president of the USD can essentially dictate the ability of stockholders of companies to make a profit until they kowtow to his ideas of how the companies should spend their capital goes against the very concept of our capitalistic structure. It is essentially the nationalization of the businesses without the benefit of paying compensation.

“I have determined that, for the Good of our Country, especially in these very troubled and dangerous times, our Military Budget for the year 2027 should not be $1 Trillion Dollars, but rather $1.5 Trillion Dollars,” he posted on social media.

Defense stocks, in turn, trended sharply upwards in after-hours trading, regaining much of their initial losses. It was not clear if a broader deal with Congress, which authorizes defense spending, has been reached. Trump attributed the ability to afford the increase to his tariff policies.

The White House and Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comments on more detail about the posts.

Wouldn't it be fun to have advanced knowledge of that change of heart?

Jeff
Print the post


Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 3853 
Subject: Re: A real risk to US stocks
Date: 01/07/26 8:16 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0

Wouldn't it be fun to have advanced knowledge of that change of heart?

I have been barking, for years, about how US defense contractors suck up enormous sums of government money, and deliver chronic cost and schedule overruns, with little ever actually deployed.

I won't comment further on the "why now", here, because I would be flamed.

Steve
Print the post


Author: jerryab   😊 😞
Number: of 3853 
Subject: Re: A real risk to US stocks
Date: 01/07/26 10:16 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
“Defense Contractors are currently issuing massive Dividends to their Shareholders and massive Stock Buybacks, at the expense and detriment of investing in Plants and Equipment,” Trump wrote in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform.

More BS. Make it very simple. No payments for defense contracts until the goods are delivered and the items received are approved as meeting specs.
Print the post


Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 3853 
Subject: Re: A real risk to US stocks
Date: 01/08/26 2:38 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
No payments for defense contracts until the goods are delivered and the items received are approved as meeting specs.

I actually think targeting the CEOs and shareholders is the right strategy, as it seems CEOs are more concerned with stuffing money in their own pockets, than in making the company perform. Equally, the shareholders are more interested in seeing "maximum shareholder value", than the long term health of the company. Cutting off 8 figure paydays, divis, and buybacks, could well focus their minds on actually getting something done.

Steve
Print the post


Author: Timer321   😊 😞
Number: of 3853 
Subject: Re: A real risk to US stocks
Date: 01/08/26 6:17 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to cap executive pay at major US defense contractors and ban shareholder dividends and stock buybacks, accusing the industry of prioritizing profits over production speed.

Frankly, there is a lot of honesty in that. I remember living in an area growing up with many executives in the neighborhood. Pay was nothing like it is now. Those were far more honest men.

Today's shoddiness is inexcusable.

Trump is trying to form a corporate policy for a massive decades-long expansion of our industrial base. It is a very different morality than what we have seen in 50 years. He is old enough to know better.
Print the post


Author: Timer321   😊 😞
Number: of 3853 
Subject: Re: A real risk to US stocks
Date: 01/09/26 12:18 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
He is against stock buybacks and overpaid defense contractors, but he wants to propup the housing market.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-wants-go...
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds