Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (30) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86269 
Subject: Re: Here’s What Honoring The Oath Looks Like
Date: 04/21/25 9:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Who are these democrats that spoke out in favor of the police during the Floyd riots? They don't exist. Her position quickly became the mainstream on policing and crime in blue states.

That's certainly the GOP argument. Though surprisingly few governmental bodies actually defunded the police, for it to have been a "mainstream" position. In fact, AOC staked out her position in criticism of New York City, because they didn't defund the police to her satisfaction. Democrats realized very quickly that the position the Groups wanted them to take was political poison, and only ended up doing it in a relatively modest number of cities.

Regardless, that's why politicians like Shapiro and Beshear and Whitmer that didn't get out in front of those issues back in the day will be able to avoid taking the shots that AOC (and some others) would take if they ran.

AOC likely thinks of herself as President, for sure. But not from her perch in the House. She needs Schumer or Gillibrand to retire so she can have a far better launching pad in the Senate.

They say every Senator sees a President when they look in the mirror...but the Senate has not been a particularly auspicious launching pad for Presidential ambitions. It's the nature of the job. You're constantly taking votes. You're often taking votes on bills that were drafted by the opposing party specifically to be painful; also you often have to hold your nose and take a vote on a bill from your side that you'd prefer not to cast. Presidents are rarely elected directly from the Senate.

Being a governor is a better perch to reach for the Presidency. Being the Veep is also good (but has its own challenges).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (30) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community