Post #2670 by mechinv on the Mechanical Investing board

Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

The problem with keeping the name Tech_Growers, but adding in the other industries, is that it's possible for non-tech companies to (now) show up on the list.

I hear what you're staying. However, non-tech companies were already showing up in the "classic" Tech Growers screen. For example, the TG list from back in June included GCT, TOST, and MELI.

These would now be excluded if we used the new industry classification. So if we go back to including these "non-tech" companies, we would be more in keeping with the picks from the classic Tech Growers screen. That's why we don't need a Tech Growers Plus screen if the intent is to continue to have picks similar to the classic screen.

That being said, it's because of lohill's generosity of time and effort, that we get to see these screen listings. So I will defer to whatever decision he makes.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Mechanical Investing FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.