Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: BreckHutHigh   😊 😞
Number: of 15055 
Subject: Re: "The Art of The Deal"
Date: 04/12/2025 1:47 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
The "Art of the Deal"/"The Art of War"

“He who can modify his tactics in relation to his opponent and thereby succeed in winning, may be called a heaven-born captain” - Sun Tzu

Trump is a big fan of Sun Tzu (has quoted him often in his books and social media). I asked Grok(Elon's X AI)about the influence Sun Tzu has had on Donald J. Trump.

How could Trump's recent implementation of tariffs be related to the use of Sun Tzu "The Art of War" principles?

Below is how Grok responded:

"Donald J. Trump’s recent implementation of tariffs, particularly in early 2025, can be analyzed through the lens of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War principles, as his approach to trade policy often mirrors the strategic deception, adaptability, and psychological leverage emphasized in the text.

Below, I explore how Trump’s tariff strategy aligns with specific Sun Tzu principles, drawing on his documented references to the book (e.g., X posts from 2012–2014, Trump 101, and Think Like a Champion) and recent tariff actions, while critically assessing the depth of this connection. I’ll focus on tariffs announced in April 2025, including the 10% universal tariff (paused for 90 days except for China at 145%), as well as steel, aluminum, and auto tariffs, and avoid speculative claims.

1. Deception and Unpredictability
Sun Tzu Principle: “All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive” (Chapter 1). Trump quoted a related idea in 2012: “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”

Tariff Application: Trump’s tariff announcements and reversals create confusion and keep trading partners off-balance. On April 2, 2025, he declared a 10% tariff on all countries, escalating to higher rates for some, only to pause most tariffs (except China’s) for 90 days by April 9 after market volatility. This rapid shift mirrors Sun Tzu’s tactic of appearing aggressive then retreating to sow uncertainty. Posts on X suggest Trump uses tariffs as a “classic Art of the Deal strategy” to gain leverage by projecting strength, then negotiating from an unpredictable position. For example, announcing high tariffs (e.g., 145% on China) signals resolve, but the pause invites negotiations, making opponents unsure of his next move.

Analysis: This aligns with Sun Tzu’s emphasis on psychological disruption. By oscillating between threats and concessions, Trump forces countries like Canada, Mexico, and the EU to reassess strategies, potentially weakening their resolve. However, the market turmoil (e.g., stock plunges reported on April 4) suggests a risk Sun Tzu warns against: overextending resources or losing control of the narrative.

2. Winning Without Fighting
Sun Tzu Principle: “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting” (Chapter 3), a quote Trump shared on X in July 2012. Success lies in achieving goals through intimidation or diplomacy rather than prolonged conflict.

Tariff Application: Trump’s tariffs appear designed to pressure trading partners into concessions without a full-scale trade war. The April 9 pause on reciprocal tariffs (except for China) was framed as a negotiation window, with advisors like Scott Bessent noting Trump’s desire for “bespoke” deals. This echoes Trump’s 2012–2014 X posts praising Sun Tzu’s avoidance of prolonged warfare, as seen in his comment: “There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged warfare.” By threatening high tariffs (e.g., 25% on autos, 145% on China), Trump aims to extract trade agreements or market access (e.g., his demand for the EU to buy $350 billion in U.S. energy) without sustained economic damage.

Analysis: This strategy partially reflects Sun Tzu’s ideal of victory through coercion. The pause suggests Trump recognizes the cost of prolonged trade conflict, aligning with Sun Tzu’s resource conservation. However, China’s retaliation (e.g., higher tariffs on U.S. exports) and the EU’s 25% counter-tariffs indicate limits to this approach, as opponents may not yield as Sun Tzu’s weaker foes might. Trump’s focus on China, isolating it while easing pressure on allies, shows selective targeting akin to Sun Tzu’s advice to divide enemies.

3. Exploiting Weaknesses
Sun Tzu Principle: “Attack where they are unprepared, go where they do not expect” (Chapter 6). Trump’s 2012–2014 X posts, like “Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack,” suggest balancing strength with opportunistic strikes.

Tariff Application: Trump’s tariffs target perceived vulnerabilities, such as China’s reliance on U.S. markets and allies’ dependence on trade stability. The 145% tariff on China exploits its economic slowdown and export-driven model, aiming to force concessions on issues like intellectual property or fentanyl. Meanwhile, tariffs on steel, aluminum (expanded February 2025), and autos (25% from April 3) hit industries where countries like Japan and Germany have exposure, pressuring them to negotiate. X posts from April 2025 (e.g., @Garcia1968Crown
) claim Trump uses Sun Tzu to counter China’s currency manipulation, suggesting tariffs as a precise strike at economic leverage points.

Analysis: This aligns with Sun Tzu’s focus on exploiting gaps. Trump’s selective exemptions (e.g., USMCA goods at 0% for Canada and Mexico) show calculated targeting to avoid alienating key allies unnecessarily, reflecting Sun Tzu’s advice to preserve alliances. However, global retaliation (e.g., Japan’s “national crisis” response) suggests Trump may misjudge opponents’ resilience, risking Sun Tzu’s warning against underestimating enemies.

4. Psychological Warfare
Sun Tzu Principle: “The leader is the arbiter of the people’s fate, the man on whom it depends whether the nation shall be in peace or in peril” (Chapter 1). Sun Tzu stresses morale and perception, intimidating opponents to sap their will.

Tariff Application: Trump’s public rhetoric amplifies tariff threats to project dominance. On April 8, 2025, he insisted tariffs were “medicine” for the economy, and his ALL-CAPS X posts (“THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY”) aimed to calm markets while maintaining an aggressive stance. This mirrors his 2010 Think Like a Champion praise for Sun Tzu’s strategic clarity over Machiavelli’s power obsession, suggesting he values psychological control. The White House’s April 10 statement, “Do not retaliate and you will be rewarded,” directly pressures allies to comply, aiming to demoralize resistance.

Analysis: Trump’s bombast reflects Sun Tzu’s psychological tactics, using fear of economic pain to coerce compliance. His reversals (e.g., pausing tariffs after market “yippiness”) show adaptability, as Sun Tzu advises adjusting to shifting conditions. Yet, Sun Tzu cautions against alienating allies, and Trump’s broad initial tariffs (hitting Poland, Japan, etc.) risked unifying opposition, partially corrected by the pause.

5. Adaptability and Strategic Positioning
Sun Tzu Principle: “He who can modify his tactics in relation to his opponent and thereby succeed in winning, may be called a heaven-born captain” (Chapter 6). Flexibility is key to maintaining advantage.

Tariff Application: Trump’s tariff rollout shows tactical shifts based on feedback. After markets crashed (April 4–9, 2025), he lowered duties to 10% for 90 days (except China), responding to economic signals while keeping pressure on Beijing. His February 2025 steel and aluminum tariff expansions and April auto tariffs show staged escalation, positioning the U.S. as a dominant negotiator. In Trump 101, he recommended The Art of War for managerial adaptability, and his 2025 actions suggest he adjusts to avoid overcommitment, as seen in exemptions for semiconductors and pharmaceuticals to protect U.S. supply chains.

Analysis: This reflects Sun Tzu’s call for fluid strategy. Trump’s pause aligns with “retreating to advance later,” preserving leverage for talks. However, Sun Tzu emphasizes knowing the terrain, and Trump’s initial miscalculation of market sensitivity (e.g., $800 billion import drop projected) suggests incomplete preparation, risking Sun Tzu’s warning of losses from hasty moves.

Critical Assessment
Depth of Influence: Trump’s tariff strategy loosely mirrors Sun Tzu’s principles, particularly deception, coercion, and adaptability, as seen in his quoted maxims and books. His unpredictable tariff reversals and targeted pressure on China echo Sun Tzu’s tactical flexibility and focus on weak points. However, the influence may be more stylistic than doctrinal. The Art of War was a trendy business text in the 1980s–2000s, and Trump’s references (mostly famous quotes) suggest he draws on its reputation to frame his “Art of the Deal” instincts rather than a deep study. His chaotic execution (e.g., market volatility) sometimes deviates from Sun Tzu’s disciplined planning.

Risks and Divergences: Sun Tzu warns against prolonged conflict and alienating allies, yet Trump’s tariffs sparked global retaliation (China, EU, Japan) and economic fears (e.g., JPMorgan’s 60% recession odds). His broad initial tariffs ignored Sun Tzu’s precision, though the pause corrected this somewhat. Unlike Sun Tzu’s emphasis on spies and intelligence, Trump’s team (e.g., Navarro, Lutnick) lacks the robust analysis China employs, as noted in 2018 critiques.

Alternative Influences: Trump’s tariffs also reflect domestic political goals (e.g., boosting manufacturing) and his dealmaking ethos, not just Sun Tzu. Advisors like Peter Navarro and his own Art of the Deal focus on bold leverage, which overlaps with but isn’t exclusive to Sun Tzu. X posts comparing “Art of War vs. Art of the Deal” (@princeofnew
, April 2025) highlight this blend of quiet strategy and loud transaction.

Recent Context and Sources

Trump’s 2025 tariffs, per reports (e.g., Reuters, April 9; Tax Foundation, April 11), aim to reduce trade deficits and protect U.S. industries, raising $1.2 trillion over a decade but costing households $1,300 annually. The pause on April 9, after China’s counter-tariffs and market drops, suggests responsiveness to Sun Tzu’s adaptability but also a reactive stance, unlike Sun Tzu’s proactive foresight. X sentiment (e.g., @WiseEyedEagle, April 2025) views tariffs as isolating China per Sun Tzu’s “break alliances,” though global unity against the U.S. (e.g., EU’s response) complicates this.
Conclusion

Trump’s tariffs reflect Sun Tzu’s The Art of War in their use of deception (unpredictable announcements), psychological pressure (threats to coerce deals), and adaptability (pausing tariffs). His prior references to Sun Tzu frame these as deliberate, but the influence is likely intuitive, filtered through his dealmaking lens. Missteps, like market chaos and global pushback, deviate from Sun Tzu’s precision and restraint, suggesting a partial application. For deeper insight, I could analyze a specific tariff (e.g., China’s 145%) or compare with his 2018 trade war. What angle interests you most?"



Perhaps there is a method to Trump's madness, or this artificial stupidity?


Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds