Post #5504 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

i>The lighting on that shot sucked, too. Yeah, I'm a photo-nerd.

Clearly the photog went to school and learned that Rembrandt lighting is more dramatic than, in most cases, butterfly lighting. His portfolio will get more views than a boring flat-lit shot.

Thinking back to Clinton's $200.00 haircut, Trump's hair and makeup artist prolly cost substantially more though, to his credit, Trump Force 1 didn't stop runway traffic at a major int'l airport for an hour.

The subtle lowlighting under his cheekbones is as masterful as the abdominal makeup on the soldiers in The 300. https://wallpapercave.com/wp/cO6XZ8u.jpg

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.