Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: rochish   😊 😞
Number: of 20395 
Subject: Re: IV and growth estimates
Date: 05/06/26 1:46 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
"A simple way might be to add up:
- non-insurance earnings
- look-through earnings (using Bloomstran's)
- interest income ("Other")"

"Average: 7.0%
A clear downtrend, as expected."

As discussed previously, the book value growth in the last 5 years is 11.5% CAGR.

https://www.shrewdm.com/MB?command=recommend&pid=8...

Clearly, there is a big disconnect between the metrics the firm is using to calculate book value and the above three metrics you mentioned. Are you missing anything that the firm considers relevant to calculate book value?

What multiple are you using on the look-through earnings? Assuming you use a single multiple for all their businesses (from railroad to energy to insurance to manufacturing and services, etc.), is that a valid approach?

I think the firm uses the current market value of equities for purposes of book value calculation. Fully owned subsidiaries are included at the cost of purchase (barring write-downs, etc. such as the 10B write-down on Precision Castparts some years ago). Unless one can argue that the equities held by BRK are overvalued, that seems to be a more reasonable approach to me.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds