Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (27) |
Author: knighttof3   😊 😞
Number: of 75971 
Subject: Re: The Intractable Reason House Is Shut Down
Date: 11/06/25 3:49 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
The Bush regime wrote "Medicare Advantage" and "Part D" specifically to deal in private insurance companies, so they could skim that cash flow. Then we get luminaries like Paul Ryan, who wanted to turn Medicare into "premium support" to force all the people on conventional Medicare, into the arms of the private insurance companies, so they could skim that cash flow as well.

Amen, brother.
Medicare overheard is 2% ish.
By law, here in California, private health insurance is allowed a 15% profit margin. Nationally, it's between 12 to 18%. I don't understand how it is advantageous to the patients or the doctors to have a third-party in the middle skimming 12 to 18%. Where is the value add? I understand the concept of pooling risks, but Medicare for all would do effectively the same thing.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (27) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds