Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (82) |
Author: mungofitch ✹✺🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 22353 
Subject: Re: "The Art of The Deal"
Date: 07/29/25 10:22 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 24
Would a 15% across the board import tax get us some way to a national sales tax? Seems so, but with, as you point out, serious and undesirable side-effects.
Personally, I think a 15% or so VAT is what we need, but that's not going to happen.


That does raise another small problem with taxing imports: there just aren't enough of them.

At a guess, 6% VAT would probably be enough to wipe out the problems of the federal deficit. Maybe even as low as 4%: there is no problem with a deficit over the long run, even with forever rising real debt, as long as the debt doesn't rise faster than real GDP over time. According to figures provided by an LLM (i.e., might be wrong), the US trailing four quarter deficit was about $1.3tn and final sales of goods and services to individuals were about $21 trillion, so about 6%.

But imports are only maybe 10-15% of that, so to raise the same revenue as a 4% across-the-board VAT (which wouldn't wipe out any businesses) would be maybe 25-30% across-the-board tariff (which would break whole swaths of the economy).

My cockamamie solution: National VAT with no exemptions, plus a fixed tax credit per household of maybe $1200 so nobody in the bottom quintile ends up paying more. Then just pass a law that the federal VAT rate is whatever would bring the deficit under (say) 2.5% of GDP, averaged over a few years. Lawmakers that don't like the idea of a national VAT are not thrown overboard: they need only move a little more towards a balanced budget in other ways at any time, and the rate stays at zero!

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,861 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 58 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 55 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (82) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community